The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial Toxin-Triggered Drug Release from Gold Nanoparticle-Stabilized Liposomes for the Treatment of Bacterial Infection
Open accessAbstract
We report a new approach to selectively deliver antimicrobials to the sites of bacterial infections by utilizing bacterial toxins to activate drug release from gold nanoparticle-stabilized phospholipid liposomes. The binding of chitosan-modified gold nanoparticles to the surface of liposomes can effectively prevent them from fusing with one another and from undesirable payload release in regular storage or physiological environments. However, once these protected liposomes "see" bacteria that secrete toxins, the toxins will insert into the liposome membranes and form pores, through which the encapsulated therapeutic agents are released. The released drugs subsequently impose antimicrobial effects on the toxin-secreting bacteria. Using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a model bacterium and vancomycin as a model anti-MRSA antibiotic, we demonstrate that the synthesized gold nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes can completely release the encapsulated vancomycin within 24 h in the presence of MRSA bacteria and lead to inhibition of MRSA growth as effective as an equal amount of vancomycin-loaded liposomes (without nanoparticle stabilizers) and free vancomycin. This bacterial toxin enabled drug release from nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes provides a new, safe, and effective approach for the treatment of bacterial infections. This technique can be broadly applied to treat a variety of infections caused by bacteria that secrete pore-forming toxins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer
Davis, M. E., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2614 · Cited by 4,233
Haluska, C. K., Riske, K. A., Marchi-Artzner, V., Lehn, J.-M., Lipowsky, R., & Dimova, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0602766103 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Nanotechnology-based antimicrobials and delivery systems for biofilm-infection control
Liu, Y., Shi, L., Su, L., van der Mei, H. C., Jutte, P. C., Ren, Y., & Busscher, H. J. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00807d · Cited by 737
Cai, K., He, X., Song, Z., Yin, Q., Zhang, Y., Uckun, F. M., Jiang, C., & Cheng, J. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja513034e · Cited by 363
Bacteria‐Responsive Multifunctional Nanogel for Targeted Antibiotic Delivery
Xiong, M., Li, Y., Bao, Y., Yang, X., Hu, B., & Wang, J. (2012) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201202847 · Cited by 299
Bioresponsive Nanoparticles Targeted to Infectious Microenvironments for Sepsis Management
Zhang, C. Y., Gao, J., & Wang, Z. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201803618 · Cited by 222
Nanotools for Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Papafilippou, L., Claxton, A., Dark, P., Kostarelos, K., & Hadjidemetriou, M. (2021) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202001378 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Pornpattananangkul, D., Zhang, L., Olson, S., Aryal, S., Obonyo, M., Vecchio, K., Huang, C.-M., & Zhang, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-02-23
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4132-4139
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2092605333
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.