The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Odd–Even Effect of Repeating Aminoethylene Units in the Side Chain of N-Substituted Polyaspartamides on Gene Transfection Profiles
Abstract
A series of the N-substituted polyaspartamides possessing repeating aminoethylene units in the side chain was prepared in this study to identify polyplexes with effective endosomal escape and low cytotoxicity. All cationic N-substituted polyaspartamides showed appreciably lower cytotoxicity than that of commercial transfection reagents. Interestingly, a distinctive odd-even effect of the repeating aminoethylene units in the polymer side chain on the efficiencies of endosomal escape and transfection to several cell lines was observed. The polyplexes from the polymers with an even number of repeating aminoethylene units (PA-Es) achieved an order of magnitude higher transfection efficiency, without marked cytotoxicity, than those of the polymers with an odd number of repeating aminoethylene units (PA-Os). This odd-even effect agreed well with the buffering capacity of these polymers as well as their capability to disrupt membrane integrity selectively at endosomal pH, leading to highly effective endosomal escape of the PA-E polyplexes. Furthermore, the formation of a polyvalent charged array with precise spacing between protonated amino groups in the polymer side chain was shown to be essential for effective disruption of the endosomal membrane, thus facilitating transport of the polyplex into the cytoplasm. These data provide useful knowledge for designing polycations to construct safe and efficient nonviral gene carriers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design and development of polymers for gene delivery
Pack, D. W., Hoffman, A. S., Pun, S., & Stayton, P. S. (2005) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1775 · Cited by 2,568
Nonviral vectors for gene delivery
Mintzer, M. A., & Simanek, E. E. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr800409e · Cited by 2,366
A combinatorial polymer library approach yields insight into nonviral gene delivery
Green, J. J., Langer, R., & Anderson, D. G. (2008) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar7002336 · Cited by 579
Cited by
Block copolymer micelles in nanomedicine applications
Cabral, H., Miyata, K., Osada, K., & Kataoka, K. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00199 · Cited by 1,309
Self-citationProgress of drug-loaded polymeric micelles into clinical studies
Cabral, H., & Kataoka, K. (2014) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.042 · Cited by 837
Self-citationNucleic Acid Therapeutics Using Polyplexes: A Journey of 50 Years (and Beyond)
Lächelt, U., & Wagner, E. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5006793 · Cited by 600
Miyata, K., Nishiyama, N., & Kataoka, K. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15258k · Cited by 451
Self-citationSurface-Engineered Dendrimers in Gene Delivery
Yang, J., Zhang, Q., Chang, H., & Cheng, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500542t · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Uchida, H., Miyata, K., Oba, M., Ishii, T., Suma, T., Itaka, K., Nishiyama, N., & Kataoka, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-09-13
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 15524-15532
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2321534064
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.