Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 630

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cathode Composites for Li–S Batteries via the Use of Oxygenated Porous Architectures

Demir-Cakan, Rezan, Morcrette, Mathieu, Nouar, Farid, Davoisne, Carine, Devic, Thomas, Gonbeau, Danielle, Dominko, Robert, Serre, Christian, Férey, Gérard, Tarascon, Jean-Marie·2011·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Li-S rechargeable batteries are attractive for electric transportation because of their low cost, environmentally friendliness, and superior energy density. However, the Li-S system has yet to conquer the marketplace, owing to its drawbacks, namely, soluble polysulfide formation. To tackle this issue, we present here a strategy based on the use of a mesoporous chromium trimesate metal-organic framework (MOF) named MIL-100(Cr) as host material for sulfur impregnation. Electrodes containing sulfur impregnated within the pores of the MOF were found to show a marked increase in the capacity retention of Li-S cathodes. Complementary transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements demonstrated the reversible capture and release of the polysulfides by the pores of MOF during cycling and evidenced a weak binding between the polysulphides and the oxygenated framework. Such an approach was generalized to other mesoporous oxide structures, such as mesoporous silica, for instance SBA-15, having the same positive effect as the MOF on the capacity retention of Li-S cells. Besides pore sizes, the surface activity of the mesoporous additives, as observed for the MOF, appears to also have a pronounced effect on enhancing the cycle performance. Increased knowledge about the interface between polysulfide species and oxide surfaces could lead to novel approaches in the design and fabrication of long cycle life S electrodes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja2062659

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 630

Metadata

Authors
Demir-Cakan, R., Morcrette, M., Nouar, F., Davoisne, C., Devic, T., Gonbeau, D., Dominko, R., Serre, C., Férey, G., & Tarascon, J.-M.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2011-09-16
Volume
133
Issue
40
Pages
16154-16160
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1971756711
Cited by
630
References
2
FWCI
26.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cathode Composites for Li–S Batteries via the Use of Oxygenated Porous Architectures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja2062659
The paper
Demir-Cakan, R., Morcrette, M., Nouar, F., Davoisne, C., Devic, T., Gonbeau, D., Dominko, R., Serre, C., Férey, G., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2011). Cathode Composites for Li–S Batteries via the Use of Oxygenated Porous Architectures. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2062659

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.