Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A New View of Electrochemistry at Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite

Patel, Anisha N., Collignon, Manon Guille, O’Connell, Michael A., Hung, Wendy O. Y., McKelvey, Kim, Macpherson, Julie V., Unwin, Patrick R.·2012·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Major new insights on electrochemical processes at graphite electrodes are reported, following extensive investigations of two of the most studied redox couples, Fe(CN)(6)(4-/3-) and Ru(NH(3))(6)(3+/2+). Experiments have been carried out on five different grades of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) that vary in step-edge height and surface coverage. Significantly, the same electrochemical characteristic is observed on all surfaces, independent of surface quality: initial cyclic voltammetry (CV) is close to reversible on freshly cleaved surfaces (>400 measurements for Fe(CN)(6)(4-/3-) and >100 for Ru(NH(3))(6)(3+/2+)), in marked contrast to previous studies that have found very slow electron transfer (ET) kinetics, with an interpretation that ET only occurs at step edges. Significantly, high spatial resolution electrochemical imaging with scanning electrochemical cell microscopy, on the highest quality mechanically cleaved HOPG, demonstrates definitively that the pristine basal surface supports fast ET, and that ET is not confined to step edges. However, the history of the HOPG surface strongly influences the electrochemical behavior. Thus, Fe(CN)(6)(4-/3-) shows markedly diminished ET kinetics with either extended exposure of the HOPG surface to the ambient environment or repeated CV measurements. In situ atomic force microscopy (AFM) reveals that the deterioration in apparent ET kinetics is coupled with the deposition of material on the HOPG electrode, while conducting-AFM highlights that, after cleaving, the local surface conductivity of HOPG deteriorates significantly with time. These observations and new insights are not only important for graphite, but have significant implications for electrochemistry at related carbon materials such as graphene and carbon nanotubes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja308615h

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Patel, A. N., Collignon, M. G., O’Connell, M. A., Hung, W. O. Y., McKelvey, K., Macpherson, J. V., & Unwin, P. R.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2012-12-03
Volume
134
Issue
49
Pages
20117-20130
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2124743354
Cited by
273
References
1
FWCI
12.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New View of Electrochemistry at Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja308615h
The paper
Patel, A. N., Collignon, M. G., O’Connell, M. A., Hung, W. O. Y., McKelvey, K., Macpherson, J. V., & Unwin, P. R. (2012). A New View of Electrochemistry at Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja308615h

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.