Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 782

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Yolk–Shell Structure of Polyaniline-Coated Sulfur for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Zhou, Weidong, Yu, Yingchao, Chen, Hao, DiSalvo, Francis J., Abruña, Héctor D.·2013·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Lithium–sulfur batteries have attracted much attention in recent years due to their high theoretical capacity of 1672 mAh g(–1) and low cost. However, a rapid capacity fade is normally observed, attributed mainly to polysulfide dissolution and volume expansion. Although many strategies have been reported to prolong the cyclability, the high cost and complex preparation processes still hinder their practical application. Here, we report the synthesis of a polyaniline–sulfur yolk–shell nanocomposite through a heating vulcanization of a polyaniline–sulfur core–shell structure. We observed that this heating treatment was much more effective than chemical leaching to prepare uniform yolk–shell structures. Compared with its sulfur–polyaniline core–shell counterparts, the yolk–shell nanostructures delivered much improved cyclability owing to the presence of internal void space inside the polymer shell to accommodate the volume expansion of sulfur during lithiation. The yolk–shell material exhibited a stable capacity of 765 mAh g(–1) at 0.2 C after 200 cycles, representing a promising future for industrial scale Li–S batteries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja409508q

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 782

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, W., Yu, Y., Chen, H., DiSalvo, F. J., & Abruña, H. D.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2013-10-23
Volume
135
Issue
44
Pages
16736-16743
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1986195379
Cited by
782
References
1
FWCI
51.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.