The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unequal Partnership: Asymmetric Roles of Polymeric Donor and Fullerene Acceptor in Generating Free Charge
Abstract
Natural photosynthetic complexes accomplish the rapid conversion of photoexcitations into spatially separated electrons and holes through precise hierarchical ordering of chromophores and redox centers. In contrast, organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells are poorly ordered, utilize only two different chemical potentials, and the same materials that absorb light must also transport charge; yet, some OPV blends achieve near-perfect quantum efficiency. Here we perform electronic structure calculations on large clusters of functionalized fullerenes of different size and ordering, predicting several features of the charge generation process, outside the framework of conventional theories but clearly observed in ultrafast electro-optical experiments described herein. We show that it is the resonant coupling of photogenerated singlet excitons to a high-energy manifold of fullerene electronic states that enables efficient charge generation, bypassing localized charge-transfer states. In contrast to conventional views, our findings suggest that fullerene cluster size, concentration, and dimensionality control charge generation efficiency, independent of exciton delocalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory and experiment
Marcus, R. A. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.599 · Cited by 3,667
Markov, D. E., Amsterdam, E., Blom, P. W. M., Sieval, A. B., & Hummelen, J. C. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp0509663 · Cited by 432
Cited by
Renewed Prospects for Organic Photovoltaics
Zhang, G., Lin, F. R., Qi, F., Heumüller, T., Distler, A., Egelhaaf, H.-J., Li, N., Chow, P. C. Y., Brabec, C. J., Jen, A. K.-Y., et al. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00955 · Cited by 1,052
Light Harvesting for Organic Photovoltaics
Hedley, G. J., Ruseckas, A., & Samuel, I. D. W. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00215 · Cited by 580
Molecular helices as electron acceptors in high-performance bulk heterojunction solar cells
Zhong, Y., Trinh, M. T., Chen, R., Purdum, G. E., Khlyabich, P. P., Sezen, M., Oh, S., Zhu, H., Fowler, B., Zhang, B., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9242 · Cited by 573
Wang, R., Zhang, C., Li, Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., & Xiao, M. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c04890 · Cited by 474
Small is Powerful: Recent Progress in Solution‐Processed Small Molecule Solar Cells
Collins, S. D., Ran, N. A., Heiber, M. C., & Nguyen, T. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201602242 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Savoie, B. M., Rao, A., Bakulin, A. A., Gelinas, S., Movaghar, B., Friend, R. H., Marks, T. J., & Ratner, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-02-07
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2876-2884
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2312307123
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.