Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engineering Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Ag Nanowires as Selective Ethylene Epoxidation Catalysts

Christopher, Phillip, Linic, Suljo·2008·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Controlling selectivity in heterogeneous catalysis is critical for the design of environmentally friendly catalytic processes that minimize the production of undesired byproducts and operate with high energy efficiency. We show that the Ag nanowire catalysts exhibit higher selectivity in the ethylene epoxidation reaction than conventional spherical particle catalysts. The higher selectivity of the nanowire catalysts was attributed to a higher concentration of the Ag(100) surface facets in the nanowire catalysts compared to the particle catalysts. Density functional theory calculations show that the transformation of the surface oxametallacycle intermediate to form the selective product, EO, is more favorable on the Ag(100) than on Ag(111). The studies show that recent advances in the controlled synthesis of uniform nanostructures with well-defined surface facets might provide an important platform for the design of highly selective heterogeneous catalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja803818k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Christopher, P., & Linic, S.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2008-07-30
Volume
130
Issue
34
Pages
11264-11265
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1972714770
Cited by
339
References
1
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.