The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of the ADP-Ribosylation Sites in the PARP-1 Automodification Domain: Analysis and Implications
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is a multimodular (domains A, B, C, D, E, and F) nuclear protein that participates in many fundamental cellular activities. Stimulated by binding to nicked DNA, PARP-1 catalyzes poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of the acceptor proteins and itself using NAD(+) as a substrate. Early studies suggested that domain D is likely an interface for protein-protein interaction between PARP-1 and its targets and is also the primary region for automodification. However, determination of the modification sites has been complicated by the heterogeneous nature of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymer. Here we report a strategy to identify the modification sites on domain D using the PARP-1 E988Q mutant, which only catalyzes mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Trypsin digestion of the modified domain D followed by LC-MS/MS analysis led to the identification of three ADP-ribosylation sites in domain D (D387, E488, and E491). Our data also show, in contrast to early reports, that automodification of PARP-1 is not limited to domain D but occurs beyond this region. In addition, domain D is not essential for PARP-1 activity since PARP-1 mutant having domain D deleted is still catalytically active. Two synthetic peptides with amino acid sequences derived from the ADP-ribosylation sites of domain D were also demonstrated to act as PARP-1 substrates. The methodology and the results reported herein will facilitate future studies of PARP-1 catalysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond
Rouleau, M., Patel, A., Hendzel, M. J., Kaufmann, S. H., & Poirier, G. G. (2010) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2812 · Cited by 1,298
SIRT6 Promotes DNA Repair Under Stress by Activating PARP1
Mao, Z., Hine, C., Tian, X., Van Meter, M., Au, M., Vaidya, A., Seluanov, A., & Gorbunova, V. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1202723 · Cited by 867
Structural Basis for DNA Damage–Dependent Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by Human PARP-1
Langelier, M.-F., Planck, J. L., Roy, S., & Pascal, J. M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216338 · Cited by 665
The role of PARP in DNA repair and its therapeutic exploitation
Javle, M., & Curtin, N. J. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.382 · Cited by 320
Coordination of DNA single strand break repair
Abbotts, R., & Wilson, D. M. (2017) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.11.039 · Cited by 240
Therapeutic Potential of Combining PARP Inhibitor and Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors
Vikas, P., Borcherding, N., Chennamadhavuni, A., & Garje, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00570 · Cited by 179
Macrodomain-containing proteins: regulating new intracellular functions of mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation
Feijs, K. L. H., Forst, A. H., Verheugd, P., & Lüscher, B. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3601 · Cited by 154
Phosphoproteomic approach to characterize protein mono- and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation sites from cells
Daniels, C. M., Ong, S.-E., & Leung, A. K. L. (2014) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr401032q · Cited by 119
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 and neurodegenerative diseases: past, present, and future
Hu, M.-L., Pan, Y.-R., Yong, Y.-Y., Liu, Y., Yu, L., Qin, D.-L., Qiao, G., Law, B. Y.-K., Wu, J.-M., Zhou, X.-G., et al. (2023) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2023.102078 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Tao, Z., Gao, P., & Liu, H.-W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-09-18
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 14258-14260
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2003100658
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.