Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Probing the Nature of Noncovalent Interactions by Mass Spectrometry. A Study of Protein−CoA Ligand Binding and Assembly

Robinson, Carol V., Chung, Evonne W., Kragelund, Birthe B., Knudsen, Jens, Aplin, Robin T., Poulsen, Flemming M., Dobson, Christopher M.·1996·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

A series of noncovalent complexes formed between the 86 residue acyl CoA binding protein (ACBP) and a series of acyl CoA derivatives has been studied by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Conditions were found under which CoA ligands can be observed in the mass spectrometer bound to ACBP. Despite the very low dissociation constants (10 - 7 to 10 - 10 M) of the acyl CoA ligand complexes high ratios of ligand-to-protein concentration in the electrospray solution were found to increase the proportion of intact complex observed in the spectrum. Variation in the length of the hydrophobic acyl chain of the ligand (C 16, C 12, C 8, C 0 ) resulted in similar proportions of complex observed in the mass spectrum even though significant variation in solution dissociation constants has been measured. A substantially reduced proportion of complex was, however, found for the mutant proteins, Y28N, Y31N, and Y73F, lacking tyrosine residues involved in critical interactions with the CoA ligand. These results have been interpreted in terms of the different factors stabilizing complexes in the gas phase environment of the mass spectrometer. The complexed species were also investigated by hydrogen−deuterium exchange methods combined with mass spectrometric analysis and the results show that folding of ACBP occurs prior to complex formation in solution. The results also show increased hydrogen exchange protection in the complex when compared with the free protein. Furthermore, even after dissociation of the complex, under these nonequilibrium gas phase exchange conditions, increased protection from hydrogen exchange in the complex is maintained.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja960211x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, C. V., Chung, E. W., Kragelund, B. B., Knudsen, J., Aplin, R. T., Poulsen, F. M., & Dobson, C. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
118
Issue
36
Pages
8646-8653
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1975599463
Cited by
313
References
0
FWCI
8.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.