The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Probing the Nature of Noncovalent Interactions by Mass Spectrometry. A Study of Protein−CoA Ligand Binding and Assembly
Abstract
A series of noncovalent complexes formed between the 86 residue acyl CoA binding protein (ACBP) and a series of acyl CoA derivatives has been studied by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Conditions were found under which CoA ligands can be observed in the mass spectrometer bound to ACBP. Despite the very low dissociation constants (10 - 7 to 10 - 10 M) of the acyl CoA ligand complexes high ratios of ligand-to-protein concentration in the electrospray solution were found to increase the proportion of intact complex observed in the spectrum. Variation in the length of the hydrophobic acyl chain of the ligand (C 16, C 12, C 8, C 0 ) resulted in similar proportions of complex observed in the mass spectrum even though significant variation in solution dissociation constants has been measured. A substantially reduced proportion of complex was, however, found for the mutant proteins, Y28N, Y31N, and Y73F, lacking tyrosine residues involved in critical interactions with the CoA ligand. These results have been interpreted in terms of the different factors stabilizing complexes in the gas phase environment of the mass spectrometer. The complexed species were also investigated by hydrogen−deuterium exchange methods combined with mass spectrometric analysis and the results show that folding of ACBP occurs prior to complex formation in solution. The results also show increased hydrogen exchange protection in the complex when compared with the free protein. Furthermore, even after dissociation of the complex, under these nonequilibrium gas phase exchange conditions, increased protection from hydrogen exchange in the complex is maintained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Determining the stoichiometry and interactions of macromolecular assemblies from mass spectrometry
Hernández, H., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.73 · Cited by 655
Self-citationHigh-Resolution Native Mass Spectrometry
Tamara, S., den Boer, M. A., & Heck, A. J. R. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00212 · Cited by 511
Loo, J. A. (2000) · International Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/s1387-3806(00)00298-0 · Cited by 444
The Role of Mass Spectrometry in Structure Elucidation of Dynamic Protein Complexes
Sharon, M., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.061005.090816 · Cited by 357
Self-citationXL-MS: protein cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry
Holding, A. N. (2015) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.06.010 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, C. V., Chung, E. W., Kragelund, B. B., Knudsen, J., Aplin, R. T., Poulsen, F. M., & Dobson, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 8646-8653
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1975599463
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.