Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Construction of 3D-QSAR Models Using the 4D-QSAR Analysis Formalism

Hopfinger, A. J., Wang, Shen, Tokarski, John S., Jin, Baiqiang, Albuquerque, Magaly, Madhav, Prakash J., Duraiswami, Chaya·1997·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

4D-QSAR analysis incorporates conformational and alignment freedom into the development of 3D-QSAR models for training sets of structure−activity data by performing ensemble averaging, the fourth “dimension”. The descriptors in 4D-QSAR analysis are the grid cell (spatial) occupancy measures of the atoms composing each molecule in the training set realized from the sampling of conformation and alignment spaces. Grid cell occupancy descriptors can be generated for any atom type, group, and/or model pharmacophore. A single “active” conformation can be postulated for each compound in the training set and combined with the optimal alignment for use in other molecular design applications including other 3D-QSAR methods. The influence of the conformational entropy of each compound on its activity can be estimated. Serial use of partial least-squares, PLS, regression and a genetic algorithm, GA, is used to perform data reduction and identify the manifold of top 3D-QSAR models for a training set. The unique manifold of 3D-QSAR models is arrived at by computing the extent of orthogonality in the residuals of error among the most significant 3D-QSAR models in the general GA population. Receptor independent (RI) 4D-QSAR analysis has been successfully applied to three training sets: (a) benzylpyrimidine inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase, (b) prostaglandin PGF 2 α antinidatory analogs, and, (c) dipyridodiazepinone inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). Two general findings from these applications are that grid cell occupancy descriptors associated with the “constant” chemical structure of an analog series can be significant in the 3D-QSAR models and that there is an enormous data reduction in constructing 3D-QSAR models. The resultant 3D-QSAR models can be graphically represented by plotting the significant 3D-QSAR grid cells in space along with their descriptor attributes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja9718937

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Hopfinger, A. J., Wang, S., Tokarski, J. S., Jin, B., Albuquerque, M., Madhav, P. J., & Duraiswami, C.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1997-10-01
Volume
119
Issue
43
Pages
10509-10524
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1984811139
Cited by
414
References
7
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construction of 3D-QSAR Models Using the 4D-QSAR Analysis Formalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja9718937
The paper
Hopfinger, A. J., Wang, S., Tokarski, J. S., Jin, B., Albuquerque, M., Madhav, P. J., & Duraiswami, C. (1997). Construction of 3D-QSAR Models Using the 4D-QSAR Analysis Formalism. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9718937

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.