The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OPLS All-Atom Model for Amines: Resolution of the Amine Hydration Problem
Abstract
Classical force-field parameters have been developed for amines primarily by fitting to experimental data for pure liquids and to hydrogen-bond strengths from gas-phase ab initio calculations. The resultant parameters were used to calculate relative free energies of hydration for ammonia, methylamine, dimethylamine, and trimethylamine using free energy perturbation calculations in Monte Carlo simulations (MC/FEP). The results including the fact that the most favorable Δ G hyd occurs for methylamine are in excellent agreement with the experimental data, in contrast to numerous prior computational reports. The calculations reveal two opposing trends in water: increased contribution from hydrogen-bond acceptance and diminished contribution from hydrogen-bond donation with increasing methylation of the amines. The proper balance of hydrogen-bond strengths, which is achieved with the OPLS-AA force field, is essential for correct ordering of the free energies of hydration. MC simulations for the pure liquids of thirteen additional amines, not included in the original parametrization, then demonstrated the transferability of the force field. These simulations covered aliphatic as well as cyclic and aromatic amines. Furthermore, the appropriateness of the force field for less polar environments was confirmed through MC/FEP calculations of relative free energies of solvation and log P values in chloroform. It is apparent that the prior problems with classical force fields for amines were simply a result of nonoptimal parametrization rather than to a critical omission such as the lack of explicit polarization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Cited by
Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models
Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B., & Cammi, R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9904009 · Cited by 16,868
Jakalian, A., Jack, D. B., & Bayly, C. I. (2002) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10128 · Cited by 3,426
Force Fields for Protein Simulations
Ponder, J. W., & Case, D. A. (2003) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(03)66002-x · Cited by 1,903
Zheng, J., Tan, G., Shan, P., Liu, T., Hu, J., Feng, Y., Yang, L., Zhang, M., Chen, Z., Lin, Y., et al. (2018) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2018.09.004 · Cited by 308
Daschakraborty, S., Kiefer, P. M., Miller, Y., Motro, Y., Pines, D., Pines, E., & Hynes, J. T. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b12742 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Rizzo, R. C., & Jorgensen, W. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4827-4836
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1994055814
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.