Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 934

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variational Principles for Describing Chemical Reactions: The Fukui Function and Chemical Hardness Revisited

Ayers, Paul W., Parr, Robert G.·2000·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The fundamental principles of density functional theory are applied to achieve a better understanding of various theoretical tools for describing chemical reactivity. Emphasis is given to the Fukui function, the central site reactivity index of density functional theory, which is approached through its own variational principle. A maximum hardness principle is then developed and discussed. To make contact with an earlier proof of a maximum hardness principle, changes in chemical potential are considered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja9924039

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Ayers, P. W., & Parr, R. G.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2000-02-23
Volume
122
Issue
9
Pages
2010-2018
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2044394227
Cited by
934
References
20
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.