Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 567

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Site-Occupation-Tuned Superionic LixScCl3+xHalide Solid Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Batteries

Liang, Jianwen, Li, Xiaona, Wang, Shuo, Adair, Keegan R., Li, Weihan, Zhao, Yang, Wang, Changhong, Hu, Yongfeng, Zhang, Li, Zhao, Shangqian, Lu, Shigang, Huang, Huan, Li, Ruying, Mo, Yifei, Sun, Xueliang·2020·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The enabling of high energy density of all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) requires the development of highly Li + -conductive solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) with good chemical and electrochemical stability. Recently, halide SSEs based on different material design principles have opened new opportunities for ASSLBs. Here, we discovered a series of Li x ScCl 3+ x SSEs ( x = 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4) based on the cubic close-packed anion sublattice with room-temperature ionic conductivities up to 3 × 10 –3 S cm –1 . Owing to the low eutectic temperature between LiCl and ScCl 3, Li x ScCl 3+ x SSEs can be synthesized by a simple co-melting strategy. Preferred orientation is observed for all the samples. The influence of the value of x in Li x ScCl 3+ x on the structure and Li + diffusivity were systematically explored. With increasing x value, higher Li +, lower vacancy concentration, and less blocking effects from Sc ions are achieved, enabling the ability to tune the Li + migration. The electrochemical performance shows that Li 3 ScCl 6 possesses a wide electrochemical window of 0.9–4.3 V vs Li + /Li, stable electrochemical plating/stripping of Li for over 2500 h, as well as good compatibility with LiCoO 2 . LiCoO 2 /Li 3 ScCl 6 /In ASSLB exhibits a reversible capacity of 104.5 mAh g –1 with good cycle life retention for 160 cycles. The observed changes in the ionic conductivity and tuning of the site occupations provide an additional approach toward the design of better SSEs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.0c00134

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 567

Metadata

Authors
Liang, J., Li, X., Wang, S., Adair, K. R., Li, W., Zhao, Y., Wang, C., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Zhao, S., Lu, S., Huang, H., Li, R., Mo, Y., & Sun, X.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2020-03-26
Volume
142
Issue
15
Pages
7012-7022
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W3013942423
Cited by
567
References
39
FWCI
19.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Site-Occupation-Tuned Superionic LixScCl3+xHalide Solid Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.0c00134
The paper
Liang, J., Li, X., Wang, S., Adair, K. R., Li, W., Zhao, Y., Wang, C., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Zhao, S., Lu, S., Huang, H., Li, R., Mo, Y., & Sun, X. (2020). Site-Occupation-Tuned Superionic LixScCl3+xHalide Solid Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Batteries. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c00134

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.