Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 471

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of Cu(100)/Cu(111) Interfaces as Superior Active Sites for CO Dimerization During CO2 Electroreduction

Wu, Zhi-Zheng, Zhang, Xiao-Long, Niu, Zhuang-Zhuang, Gao, Fei-Yue, Yang, Peng-Peng, Chi, Li-Ping, Shi, Lei, Wei, Wen-Sen, Liu, Ren, Chen, Zhi, Hu, Shaojin, Zheng, Xiao, Gao, Min-Rui·2022·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The electrosynthesis of valuable multicarbon chemicals using carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) as a feedstock has substantially progressed recently but still faces considerable challenges. A major difficulty lines in the sluggish kinetics of forming carbon–carbon (C–C) bonds, especially in neutral media. We report here that oxide-derived copper crystals enclosed by six {100} and eight {111} facets can reduce CO 2 to multicarbon products with a high Faradaic efficiency of 74.9 ± 1.7% at a commercially relevant current density of 300 mA cm –2 in 1 M KHCO 3 (pH ∼ 8.4). By combining the experimental and computational studies, we uncovered that Cu(100)/Cu(111) interfaces offer a favorable local electronic structure that enhances *CO adsorption and lowers C–C coupling activation energy barriers, performing superior to Cu(100) and Cu(111) surfaces, respectively. On this catalyst, no obvious degradation was observed at 300 mA cm –2 over 50 h of continuous operation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.1c09508

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 471

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Z.-Z., Zhang, X.-L., Niu, Z.-Z., Gao, F.-Y., Yang, P.-P., Chi, L.-P., Shi, L., Wei, W.-S., Liu, R., Chen, Z., Hu, S., Zheng, X., & Gao, M.-R.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2021-12-28
Volume
144
Issue
1
Pages
259-269
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W4200061927
Cited by
471
References
9
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.