The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cathode Kinetics Evaluation in Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries afford great promise on achieving practical high energy density beyond lithium-ion batteries. Lean-electrolyte conditions constitute the prerequisite for achieving high-energy-density Li–S batteries but inevitably deteriorates battery performances, especially the sulfur cathode kinetics. Herein, the polarizations of the sulfur cathode are systematically decoupled to identify the key kinetic limiting factor in lean-electrolyte Li–S batteries. Concretely, an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy combined galvanostatic intermittent titration technique method is developed to decouple the cathodic polarizations into activation, concentration, and ohmic parts. Therein, activation polarization during lithium sulfide nucleation emerges as the dominant polarization as the electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio (E/S ratio) decreases, and the sluggish interfacial charge transfer kinetics is identified as the main reason for degraded cell performances under lean-electrolyte conditions. Accordingly, a lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide electrolyte is proposed to decrease activation polarization, and Li–S batteries adopting this electrolyte provide a discharge capacity of 985 mAh g –1 under a low E/S ratio of 4 μL mg –1 at 0.2 C. This work identifies the key kinetic limiting factor of lean-electrolyte Li–S batteries and provides guidance on designing rational promotion strategies to achieve advanced Li–S batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Pathways for practical high-energy long-cycling lithium metal batteries
Liu, J., Bao, Z., Cui, Y., Dufek, E. J., Goodenough, J. B., Khalifah, P., Li, Q., Liaw, B. Y., Liu, P., Manthiram, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0338-x · Cited by 3,412
Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries
Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T., & Winter, M. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 · Cited by 3,233
Guidelines and trends for next-generation rechargeable lithium and lithium-ion batteries
Wu, F., Maier, J., & Yu, Y. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00863e · Cited by 2,229
Winter, M., Barnett, B., & Xu, K. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00422 · Cited by 2,193
An Outlook on Lithium Ion Battery Technology
Manthiram, A. (2017) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00288 · Cited by 1,771
Rechargeable Batteries for Grid Scale Energy Storage
Zhu, Z., Jiang, T., Ali, M., Meng, Y., Jin, Y., Cui, Y., & Chen, W. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00289 · Cited by 1,769
Commercialization of Lithium Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles
Zeng, X., Li, M., Abd El‐Hady, D., Alshitari, W., Al‐Bogami, A. S., Lu, J., & Amine, K. (2019) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201900161 · Cited by 1,542
Reviving Lithium‐Metal Anodes for Next‐Generation High‐Energy Batteries
Guo, Y., Li, H., & Zhai, T. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201700007 · Cited by 1,215
Lithium–Oxygen Batteries and Related Systems: Potential, Status, and Future
Kwak, W.-J., Rosy, Sharon, D., Xia, C., Kim, H., Johnson, L. R., Bruce, P. G., Nazar, L. F., Sun, Y.-K., Frimer, A. A., et al. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609 · Cited by 1,009
Formulating energy density for designing practical lithium–sulfur batteries
Zhou, G., Chen, H., & Cui, Y. (2022) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-022-01001-0 · Cited by 983
Designing modern aqueous batteries
Liang, Y., & Yao, Y. (2022) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-022-00511-3 · Cited by 919
A Perspective toward Practical Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Zhao, M., Li, B.-Q., Zhang, X.-Q., Huang, J.-Q., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c00449 · Cited by 858
Self-citationElectrolyte solutions design for lithium-sulfur batteries
Liu, Y., Elias, Y., Meng, J., Aurbach, D., Zou, R., Xia, D., & Pang, Q. (2021) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.009 · Cited by 534
Yang, X., Adair, K. R., Gao, X., & Sun, X. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02714f · Cited by 392
Semi-Immobilized Molecular Electrocatalysts for High-Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Zhao, C.-X., Li, X.-Y., Zhao, M., Chen, Z.-X., Song, Y.-W., Chen, W.-J., Liu, J.-N., Wang, B., Zhang, X.-Q., Chen, C.-M., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c09107 · Cited by 307
Self-citationToward Practical High‐Energy‐Density Lithium–Sulfur Pouch Cells: A Review
Chen, Z., Zhao, M., Hou, L., Zhang, X., Li, B., & Huang, J. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202201555 · Cited by 282
Self-citationRedox Comediation with Organopolysulfides in Working Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
Zhao, M., Li, B.-Q., Chen, X., Xie, J., Yuan, H., & Huang, J.-Q. (2020) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2020.09.015 · Cited by 280
Self-citationZhang, G., Peng, H., Zhao, C., Chen, X., Zhao, L., Li, P., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201810132 · Cited by 244
Self-citationPeng, H., Huang, J., Liu, X., Cheng, X., Xu, W., Zhao, C., Wei, F., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b12358 · Cited by 228
Self-citationZhang, X., Jin, Q., Nan, Y., Hou, L., Li, B., Chen, X., Jin, Z., Zhang, X., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202103470 · Cited by 191
Self-citationConstructing a 700 Wh kg−1-level rechargeable lithium-sulfur pouch cell
Cheng, Q., Chen, Z.-X., Li, X.-Y., Hou, L.-P., Bi, C.-X., Zhang, X.-Q., Huang, J.-Q., & Li, B.-Q. (2023) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2022.09.029 · Cited by 164
Self-citationBoosting High-Performance in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries via Dilute Electrolyte
Wu, F., Chu, F., Ferrero, G. A., Sevilla, M., Fuertes, A. B., Borodin, O. A., Yu, Y. M., & Yushin, G. N. (2020) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01778 · Cited by 155
High-Performance Anode-Free Li–S Batteries with an Integrated Li2S–Electrocatalyst Cathode
He, J., Bhargav, A., & Manthiram, A. (2022) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02569 · Cited by 143
Unity of Opposites between Soluble and Insoluble Lithium Polysulfides in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Wang, Z., Li, Y., Ji, H., Zhou, J., Qian, T., & Yan, C. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202203699 · Cited by 140
Su, C., He, M., Amine, R., Chen, Z., & Amine, K. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201807367 · Cited by 115
Self-citationGupta, A., Bhargav, A., Jones, J.-P., Bugga, R., & Manthiram, A. (2020) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b05164 · Cited by 89
Guo, X., Ding, Y., & Yu, G. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202100052 · Cited by 86
Zerrin, T., Shang, R., Dong, B., Aguilar, E. C., Malvin, J., Ozkan, M., & Ozkan, C. S. (2022) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107913 · Cited by 84
Chien, Y., Menon, A. S., Brant, W. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b11500 · Cited by 69
Gupta, A., & Manthiram, A. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d1ta02779d · Cited by 68
Semi‐Flooded Sulfur Cathode with Ultralean Absorbed Electrolyte in Li–S Battery
Xie, Y. J., Pan, G., Jin, Q., Qi, X., Wang, T., Li, W., Xu, H., Zheng, Y., Li, S., Qie, L., et al. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201903168 · Cited by 65
Accelerating Redox Kinetics of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
Chen, Y., Gao, X., Su, D., Wang, C., & Wang, G. (2020) · Trends in Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trechm.2020.09.001 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z.-X., Cheng, Q., Li, X.-Y., Li, Z., Song, Y.-W., Sun, F., Zhao, M., Zhang, X.-Q., Li, B.-Q., & Huang, J.-Q.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-07-10
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 16449-16457
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W4383710720
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 20.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
