The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reviving Lithium‐Metal Anodes for Next‐Generation High‐Energy Batteries
Abstract
Lithium‐metal batteries (LMBs), as one of the most promising next‐generation high‐energy‐density storage devices, are able to meet the rigid demands of new industries. However, the direct utilization of metallic lithium can induce harsh safety issues, inferior rate and cycle performance, or anode pulverization inside the cells. These drawbacks severely hinder the commercialization of LMBs. Here, an up‐to‐date review of the behavior of lithium ions upon deposition/dissolution, and the failure mechanisms of lithium‐metal anodes is presented. It has been shown that the primary causes consist of the growth of lithium dendrites due to large polarization and a strong electric field at the vicinity of the anode, the hyperactivity of metallic lithium, and hostless infinite volume changes upon cycling. The recent advances in liquid organic electrolyte (LOE) systems through modulating the local current density, anion depletion, lithium flux, the anode–electrolyte interface, or the mechanical strength of the interlayers are highlighted. Concrete strategies including tailoring the anode structures, optimizing the electrolytes, building artificial anode–electrolyte interfaces, and functionalizing the protective interlayers are summarized in detail. Furthermore, the challenges remaining in LOE systems are outlined, and the future perspectives of introducing solid‐state electrolytes to radically address safety issues are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
A solid future for battery development
Janek, J., & Zeier, W. G. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 · Cited by 3,979
High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Qian, J., Henderson, W. A., Xu, W., Bhattacharya, P., Engelhard, M., Borodin, O., & Zhang, J.-G. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7362 · Cited by 2,561
Interface Stability in Solid-State Batteries
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C., & Ceder, G. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 · Cited by 1,652
Cited by
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Liu, W., Liu, P., & Mitlin, D. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202002297 · Cited by 687
Ionic liquids and derived materials for lithium and sodium batteries
Yang, Q., Zhang, Z., Sun, X.-G., Hu, Y.-S., Xing, H., & Dai, S. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00464h · Cited by 601
Recent developments and insights into the understanding of Na metal anodes for Na-metal batteries
Zhao, Y., Adair, K. R., & Sun, X. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01373j · Cited by 533
Dual‐Layered Film Protected Lithium Metal Anode to Enable Dendrite‐Free Lithium Deposition
Yan, C., Cheng, X., Tian, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, X., Li, W., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201707629 · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, Y., Li, H., & Zhai, T.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-06-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 29
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2621553322
- Cited by
- 1,215
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 49.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reviving Lithium‐Metal Anodes for Next‐Generation High‐Energy Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201700007
- The paper
- Guo, Y., Li, H., & Zhai, T. (2017). Reviving Lithium‐Metal Anodes for Next‐Generation High‐Energy Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201700007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.