The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photoexcited Surface Frustrated Lewis Pairs for Heterogeneous Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction
Abstract
In this study we investigated, theoretically and experimentally, the unique photoactive behavior of pristine and defected indium oxide surfaces providing fundamental insights into their excited state properties as well as an explanation for the experimentally observed enhanced activity of defected indium oxide surfaces for the gas-phase reverse water gas shift reaction, CO2 + H2 + hν→ CO + H2O in the light compared to the dark. To this end, a detailed excited-state study of pristine and defected forms of indium oxide (In2O3, In2O3-x, In2O3(OH)y and In2O3-x(OH)y) surfaces was performed using time dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations, the results of which were supported experimentally by transient absorption spectroscopy and photoconductivity measurements. It was found that the surface frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) created by a Lewis acidic coordinately unsaturated surface indium site proximal to an oxygen vacancy and a Lewis basic surface hydroxide site in In2O3-x(OH)y become more acidic and basic and hence more active in the ES compared to the GS. This provides a theoretical mechanism responsible for the enhanced activity and reduced activation energy of the photochemical reverse water gas shift reaction observed experimentally for In2O3-x(OH)y compared to the thermochemical reaction. This fundamental insight into the role of photoexcited surface FLPs for catalytic CO2 reduction could lead to improved photocatalysts for solar fuel production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: state of the art and future challenges
Gao, W., Liang, S., Wang, R., Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Q., Xie, B., Toe, C. Y., Zhu, X., Wang, J., et al. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00025f · Cited by 1,388
Theoretical Insights into Heterogeneous (Photo)electrochemical CO2Reduction
Xu, S., & Carter, E. A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00481 · Cited by 652
Kovačič, Ž., Likozar, B., & Huš, M. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c02557 · Cited by 474
Zhao, Y., Waterhouse, G. I. N., Chen, G., Xiong, X., Wu, L.-Z., Tung, C.-H., & Zhang, T. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00607e · Cited by 435
Huo, Y., Zhang, J., Dai, K., Li, Q., Lv, J., Zhu, G., & Liang, C. (2019) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.073 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghuman, K. K., Hoch, L. B., Szymanski, P., Loh, J. Y. Y., Kherani, N. P., El-Sayed, M. A., Ozin, G. A., & Singh, C. V.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-01-25
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1206-1214
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2233947154
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photoexcited Surface Frustrated Lewis Pairs for Heterogeneous Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.5b10179
- The paper
- Ghuman, K. K., Hoch, L. B., Szymanski, P., Loh, J. Y. Y., Kherani, N. P., El-Sayed, M. A., Ozin, G. A., & Singh, C. V. (2016). Photoexcited Surface Frustrated Lewis Pairs for Heterogeneous Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b10179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.