The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thioether-Based Fluorescent Covalent Organic Framework for Selective Detection and Facile Removal of Mercury(II)
Abstract
Heavy metal ions are highly toxic and widely spread as environmental pollutants. New strategies are being developed to simultaneously detect and remove these toxic ions. Herein, we take the intrinsic advantage of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) and develop fluorescent COFs for sensing applications. As a proof-of-concept, a thioether-functionalized COF material, COF-LZU8, was "bottom-up" integrated with multifunctionality for the selective detection and facile removal of mercury(II): the π-conjugated framework as the signal transducer, the evenly and densely distributed thioether groups as the Hg(2+) receptor, the regular pores facilitating the real-time detection and mass transfer, together with the robust COF structure for recycle use. The excellent sensing performance of COF-LZU8 was achieved in terms of high sensitivity, excellent selectivity, easy visibility, and real-time response. Meanwhile, the efficient removal of Hg(2+) from water and the recycling of COF-LZU8 offers the possibility for practical applications. In addition, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and solid-state NMR investigations verified the strong and selective interaction between Hg(2+) and the thioether groups of COF-LZU8. This research not only demonstrates the utilization of fluorescent COFs for both sensing and removal of metal ions but also highlights the facile construction of functionalized COFs for environmental applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hong, Y., Lam, J. W. Y., & Tang, B. Z. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15113d · Cited by 6,363
Nanoadsorbents: Classification, Preparation, and Applications (with Emphasis on Aqueous Media)
Khajeh, M., Laurent, S., & Dastafkan, K. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400086v · Cited by 528
Fang, Q.-R., Yuan, D.-Q., Sculley, J., Li, J.-R., Han, Z.-B., & Zhou, H.-C. (2010) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic101935f · Cited by 309
Cited by
Covalent Organic Frameworks: Structures, Synthesis, and Applications
Lohse, M. S., & Bein, T. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201705553 · Cited by 1,527
Liu, R., Tan, K. T., Gong, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Xie, S., He, T., Lu, Z., Yang, H., & Jiang, D. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00620c · Cited by 1,083
Self-citationFan, H., Mundstock, A., Feldhoff, A., Knebel, A., Gu, J., Meng, H., & Caro, J. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b05136 · Cited by 758
Chen, R., Shi, J., Ma, Y., Lin, G., Lang, X., & Wang, C. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201902543 · Cited by 697
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) for environmental applications
Wang, J., & Zhuang, S. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213046 · Cited by 677
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, S.-Y., Dong, M., Wang, Y.-W., Chen, Y.-T., Wang, H.-Z., Su, C.-Y., & Wang, W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-02-29
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3031-3037
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2279533943
- Cited by
- 1,333
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 64.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.