The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Highly Selective and Efficient Removal of Heavy Metals by Layered Double Hydroxide Intercalated with the MoS42– Ion
Abstract
The MoS4(2-) ion was intercalated into magnesium-aluminum layered double hydroxide (MgAl-NO3-LDH) to produce a single phase material of Mg0.66Al0.34(OH)2(MoS4)0.17·nH2O (MgAl-MoS4-LDH), which demonstrates highly selective binding and extremely efficient removal of heavy metal ions such as Cu(2+), Pb(2+), Ag(+), and Hg(2+). The MoS4-LDH displays a selectivity order of Co(2+), Ni(2+), Zn(2+) < Cd(2+) ≪ Pb(2+) < Cu(2+) < Hg(2+) < Ag(+) for the metal ions. The enormous capacities for Hg(2+) (∼500 mg/g) and Ag(+) (450 mg/g) and very high distribution coefficients (Kd) of ∼10(7) mL/g place the MoS4-LDH at the top of materials known for such removal. Sorption isotherm for Ag(+) agrees with the Langmuir model suggesting a monolayer adsorption. It can rapidly lower the concentrations of Cu(2+), Pb(2+), Hg(2+), and Ag(+) from ppm levels to trace levels of ≤1 ppb. For the highly toxic Hg(2+) (at ∼30 ppm concentration), the adsorption is exceptionally rapid and highly selective, showing a 97.3% removal within 5 min, 99.7% removal within 30 min, and ∼100% removal within 1 h. The sorption kinetics for Cu(2+), Ag(+), Pb(2+), and Hg(2+) follows a pseudo-second-order model suggesting a chemisorption with the adsorption mechanism via M-S bonding. X-ray diffraction patterns of the samples after adsorption demonstrate the coordination and intercalation structures depending on the metal ions and their concentration. After the capture of heavy metals, the crystallites of the MoS4-LDH material retain the original hexagonal prismatic shape and are stable at pH ≈ 2-10. The MoS4-LDH material is thus promising for the remediation of heavy metal polluted water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zubair, M., Daud, M., McKay, G., Shehzad, F., & Al-Harthi, M. A. (2017) · Applied Clay Science · doi:10.1016/j.clay.2017.04.002 · Cited by 518
Behbahani, E. S., Dashtian, K., & Ghaedi, M. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124560 · Cited by 236
Zbair, M., Ait Ahsaine, H., Anfar, Z., & Slassi, A. (2019) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.120 · Cited by 73
Mubarak, M., Jeon, H., Islam, M. S., Yoon, C., Bae, J.-S., Hwang, S.-J., Choi, W. S., & Lee, H.-J. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.046 · Cited by 59
Bi, R., Yin, D., Zhang, S., Zhang, R., & Chen, F. (2022) · Applied Clay Science · doi:10.1016/j.clay.2022.106536 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, L., Wang, Q., Islam, S. M., Liu, Y., Ma, S., & Kanatzidis, M. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-02-15
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2858-2866
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2261822255
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Selective and Efficient Removal of Heavy Metals by Layered Double Hydroxide Intercalated with the MoS42– Ion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b00110
- The paper
- Ma, L., Wang, Q., Islam, S. M., Liu, Y., Ma, S., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2016). Highly Selective and Efficient Removal of Heavy Metals by Layered Double Hydroxide Intercalated with the MoS42– Ion. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b00110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.