The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partitioning MOF-5 into Confined and Hydrophobic Compartments for Carbon Capture under Humid Conditions
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), by virtue of their remarkable uptake capability, selectivity, and ease of regeneration, hold great promise for carbon capture from fossil fuel combustion. However, their stability toward moisture together with the competitive adsorption of water against CO2 drastically dampens their capacity and selectivity under real humid flue gas conditions. In this work, an effective strategy was developed to tackle the above obstacles by partitioning the channels of MOFs into confined, hydrophobic compartments by in situ polymerization of aromatic acetylenes. Specifically, polynaphthylene was formed via a radical reaction inside the channels of MOF-5 and served as partitions without altering the underlying structure of the framework. Compared with pristine MOF-5, the resultant material (PN@MOF-5) exhibits a doubled CO2 capacity (78 vs 38 cm(3)/g at 273 K and 1 bar), 23 times higher CO2/N2 selectivity (212 vs 9), and significantly improved moisture stability. The dynamic CO2 adsorption capacity can be largely maintained (>90%) under humid conditions during cycles. This strategy can be applied to other MOF materials and may shed light on the design of new MOF-polymer materials with tunable pore sizes and environments to promote their practical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be
Haszeldine, R. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172246 · Cited by 2,021
Development trends in porous adsorbents for carbon capture
Sreenivasulu, B., Sreedhar, I., Suresh, P., & Raghavan, K. V. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b03149 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Carbon capture and conversion using metal–organic frameworks and MOF-based materials
Ding, M., Flaig, R. W., Jiang, H.-L., & Yaghi, O. M. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00829a · Cited by 2,616
The chemistry of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 capture, regeneration and conversion
Trickett, C. A., Helal, A., Al-Maythalony, B. A., Yamani, Z. H., Cordova, K. E., & Yaghi, O. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.45 · Cited by 1,524
Metal-organic frameworks for advanced drug delivery
He, S., Wu, L., Li, X., Sun, H., Xiong, T., Liu, J., Huang, C., Xu, H., Sun, H., Chen, W., et al. (2021) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.019 · Cited by 528
Understanding the Effect of Water on CO2 Adsorption
Kolle, J. M., Fayaz, M., & Sayari, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00762 · Cited by 523
Xiao, J., Zhu, Y., Huddleston, S., Li, P., Xiao, B., Farha, O. K., & Ameer, G. A. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b01850 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, N., Li, H., Feng, X., Wang, Q., Wang, S., Ma, L., Zhou, J., & Wang, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-08-03
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 10100-10103
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2503661256
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partitioning MOF-5 into Confined and Hydrophobic Compartments for Carbon Capture under Humid Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.6b06051
- The paper
- Ding, N., Li, H., Feng, X., Wang, Q., Wang, S., Ma, L., Zhou, J., & Wang, B. (2016). Partitioning MOF-5 into Confined and Hydrophobic Compartments for Carbon Capture under Humid Conditions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b06051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.