The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing CO2 Electroreduction with the Metal–Oxide Interface
Open accessAbstract
The electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR) typically uses transition metals as the catalysts. To improve the efficiency, tremendous efforts have been dedicated to tuning the morphology, size, and structure of metal catalysts and employing electrolytes that enhance the adsorption of CO 2 . We report here a strategy to enhance CO 2 RR by constructing the metal–oxide interface. We demonstrate that Au–CeO x shows much higher activity and Faradaic efficiency than Au or CeO x alone for CO 2 RR. In situ scanning tunneling microscopy and synchrotron-radiation photoemission spectroscopy show that the Au–CeO x interface is dominant in enhancing CO 2 adsorption and activation, which can be further promoted by the presence of hydroxyl groups. Density functional theory calculations indicate that the Au–CeO x interface is the active site for CO 2 activation and the reduction to CO, where the synergy between Au and CeO x promotes the stability of key carboxyl intermediate (*COOH) and thus facilitates CO 2 RR. Similar interface-enhanced CO 2 RR is further observed on Ag–CeO x, demonstrating the generality of the strategy for enhancing CO 2 RR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00071j · Cited by 3,784
Ionic Liquid–Mediated Selective Conversion of CO 2 to CO at Low Overpotentials
Rosen, B. A., Salehi-Khojin, A., Thorson, M. R., Zhu, W., Whipple, D. T., Kenis, P. J. A., & Masel, R. I. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1209786 · Cited by 1,558
Cited by
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223
Electrocatalysis for CO 2 conversion: from fundamentals to value-added products
Wang, G., Chen, J., Ding, Y., Cai, P., Yi, L., Li, Y., Tu, C., Hou, Y., Wen, Z., & Dai, L. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00071j · Cited by 1,295
Defect and Interface Engineering for Aqueous Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction
Wang, Y., Han, P., Lv, X., Zhang, L., & Zheng, G. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.021 · Cited by 677
Recent Advances in Electrochemical CO2‐to‐CO Conversion on Heterogeneous Catalysts
Zheng, T., Jiang, K., & Wang, H. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201802066 · Cited by 579
Su, P., Pei, W., Wang, X., Ma, Y., Jiang, Q., Liang, J., Zhou, S., Zhao, J., Liu, J., & Lu, G. Q. (. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202103557 · Cited by 464
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, D., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Z., Cai, F., Zhao, X., Huang, W., Li, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, P., Yang, F., Wang, G., & Bao, X.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-04-14
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5652-5655
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2604354802
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing CO2 Electroreduction with the Metal–Oxide Interface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.7b00102
- The paper
- Gao, D., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Z., Cai, F., Zhao, X., Huang, W., Li, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, P., Yang, F., Wang, G., & Bao, X. (2017). Enhancing CO2 Electroreduction with the Metal–Oxide Interface. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b00102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
