The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
2D Conductive Iron-Quinoid Magnets Ordering up to Tc = 105 K via Heterogenous Redox Chemistry
Open accessAbstract
We report the magnetism and conductivity for a redox pair of iron-quinoid metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). The oxidized compound, (Me 2 NH 2 ) 2 [Fe 2 L 3 ]·2H 2 O·6DMF (LH 2 = 2,5-dichloro-3,6-dihydroxo-1,4-benzoquinone) was previously shown to magnetically order below 80 K in its solvated form, with the ordering temperature decreasing to 26 K upon desolvation. Here, we demonstrate this compound to exhibit electrical conductivity values up to σ = 1.4(7) × 10 –2 S/cm ( E a = 0.26(1) cm –1 ) and 1.0(3) × 10 –3 S/cm ( E a = 0.19(1) cm –1 ) in its solvated and desolvated forms, respectively. Upon soaking in a DMF solution of Cp 2 Co, the compound undergoes a single-crystal-to-single-crystal one-electron reduction to give (Cp 2 Co) 1.43 (Me 2 NH 2 ) 1.57 [Fe 2 L 3 ]·4.9DMF. Structural and spectroscopic analysis confirms this reduction to be ligand-based, and as such the trianionic framework is formulated as [Fe III 2 (L 3–• ) 3 ] 3– . Magnetic measurements for this reduced compound reveal the presence of dominant intralayer metal–organic radical coupling to give a magnetically ordered phase below T c = 105 K, one of the highest reported ordering temperatures for a MOF. This high ordering temperature is significantly increased relative to the oxidized compound, and stems from the overall increase in coupling strength afforded by an additional organic radical. In line with the high critical temperature, the new MOF exhibits magnetic hysteresis up to 100 K, as revealed by variable-field measurements. Finally, this compound is electrically conductive, with values up to σ = 5.1(3) × 10 –4 S/cm with E a = 0.34(1) eV. Taken together, these results demonstrate the unique ability of metal-quinoid MOFs to simultaneously exhibit both high magnetic ordering temperatures and high electrical conductivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
OLEX2 : a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program
Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K., & Puschmann, H. (2009) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889808042726 · Cited by 32,811
The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks
Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230444 · Cited by 16,945
Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications
Žutić, I., Fabian, J., & Das Sarma, S. (2004) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.323 · Cited by 11,268
Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials
Yaghi, O. M., O'Keeffe, M., Ockwig, N. W., Chae, H. K., Eddaoudi, M., & Kim, J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01650 · Cited by 9,101
A Chemically Functionalizable Nanoporous Material [Cu 3 (TMA) 2 (H 2 O) 3 ] n
Chui, S. S.-Y., Lo, S. M.-F., Charmant, J. P. H., Orpen, A. G., & Williams, I. D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5405.1148 · Cited by 6,063
A homochiral metal–organic porous material for enantioselective separation and catalysis
Seo, J. S., Whang, D., Lee, H., Jun, S. I., Oh, J., Jeon, Y. J., & Kim, K. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35010088 · Cited by 3,924
Selective binding and removal of guests in a microporous metal–organic framework
Yaghi, O. M., Li, G., & Li, H. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378703a0 · Cited by 3,081
Diamagnetic Corrections and Pascal's Constants
Bain, G. A., & Berry, J. F. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed085p532 · Cited by 2,718
Magnetic metal–organic frameworks
Kurmoo, M. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b804757j · Cited by 2,448
Postsynthetic modification of metal–organic frameworks
Wang, Z., & Cohen, S. M. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b802258p · Cited by 1,973
Cited by
Chakraborty, G., Park, I.-H., Medishetty, R., & Vittal, J. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01049 · Cited by 928
Interface-Assisted Synthesis of 2D Materials: Trend and Challenges
Dong, R., Zhang, T., & Feng, X. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00056 · Cited by 710
Li, W.-H., Deng, W.-H., Wang, G.-E., & Xu, G. (2020) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100029 · Cited by 373
Skorupskii, G., Trump, B. A., Kasel, T. W., Brown, C. M., Hendon, C. H., & Dincă, M. (2020) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-019-0372-0 · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- DeGayner, J. A., Jeon, I.-R., Sun, L., Dincă, M., & Harris, T. D.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-03-13
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4175-4184
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2590385466
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 2D Conductive Iron-Quinoid Magnets Ordering up to Tc = 105 K via Heterogenous Redox Chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.7b00705
- The paper
- DeGayner, J. A., Jeon, I.-R., Sun, L., Dincă, M., & Harris, T. D. (2017). 2D Conductive Iron-Quinoid Magnets Ordering up to Tc = 105 K via Heterogenous Redox Chemistry. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b00705
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.