Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Scaffolding Strategy with Synergistic Active Centers To Facilitate Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Hydrocarbon/Alcohol

Jiao, Yan, Zheng, Yao, Chen, Ping, Jaroniec, Mietek, Qiao, Shi-Zhang·2017·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

A major impediment to the electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction reaction (CRR) is the lack of electrocatalysts with both high efficiency and good selectivity toward liquid fuels or other valuable chemicals. Effective strategies for the design of electrocatalysts are yet to be discovered to substitute the conventional trial-and-error approach. This work shows that a combination of density functional theory (DFT) computation and experimental validation of molecular scaffolding to coordinate the metal active centers presents a new molecular-level strategy for the development of electrocatalysts with high CRR selectivity toward hydrocarbon/alcohol. Taking the most widely investigated Cu as a probe, our study reveals that the use of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C 3 N 4 ) as a molecular scaffold allows for an appropriate modification of the electronic structure of Cu in the resultant Cu–C 3 N 4 complex. As a result, the adsorption behavior of some key reaction intermediates can be optimized on the Cu–C 3 N 4 surface, which greatly benefits the activation of CO 2 and leads to a more facile CO 2 reduction to desired products as compared with those on the Cu(111) surface and other kinds of Cu complexes formed on nitrogen-doped carbons. Remarkably, different from the most studied elementary metal surfaces, an intramolecular synergistic catalysis with dual active centers was for the first time observed on the Cu–C 3 N 4 complex model, which possesses a unique capability to generate C 2 products. A good agreement between electrochemical measurements and the DFT analysis of the CRR has been achieved on the basis of the newly designed and synthesized Cu–C 3 N 4 electrocatalyst.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.7b10817

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Chen, P., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S.-Z.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2017-12-01
Volume
139
Issue
49
Pages
18093-18100
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2770355995
Cited by
531
References
15
FWCI
15.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Scaffolding Strategy with Synergistic Active Centers To Facilitate Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Hydrocarbon/Alcohol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.7b10817
The paper
Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Chen, P., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2017). Molecular Scaffolding Strategy with Synergistic Active Centers To Facilitate Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Hydrocarbon/Alcohol. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b10817

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.