Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unveiling the Role of tBP–LiTFSI Complexes in Perovskite Solar Cells

Wang, Shen, Huang, Zihan, Wang, Xuefeng, Li, Yingmin, Günther, Marcella, Valenzuela, Sophia, Parikh, Pritesh, Cabreros, Amanda, Xiong, Wei, Meng, Ying Shirley·2018·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Lead halide-based perovskite materials have been applied as an intrinsic layer for next-generation photovoltaic devices. However, the stability and performance reproducibility of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) needs to be further improved to match that of silicon photovoltaic devices before they can be commercialized. One of the major bottlenecks that hinders the improvement of device stability/reproducibility is the additives in the hole-transport layer, lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) and 4- tert-butylpyridine (tBP). Despite the positive effects of these hole-transport layer additives, LiTFSI is hygroscopic and can adsorb moisture to accelerate the perovskite decomposition. On the other hand, tBP, the only liquid component in PSCs, which evaporates easily, is corrosive to perovskite materials. Since 2012, the empirical molar ratio 6:1 tBP:LiTFSI has been wildly applied in PSCs without further concerns. In this study, the formation of tBP-LiTFSI complexes at various molar ratios has been discovered and investigated thoroughly. These complexes in PSCs can alleviate the negative effects (decomposition and corrosion) of individual components tBP and LiTFSI while maintaining their positive effects on perovskite materials. Consequently, a minor change in tBP:LiTFSI ratio results in huge influences on the stability of perovskite. Due to the existence of uncomplexed tBP in the 6:1 tBP:LiTFSI mixture, this empirical tBP-LiTFSI molar ratio has been demonstrated not as the ideal ratio in PSCs. Instead, the 4:1 tBP:LiTFSI mixture, in which all components are complexed, shows all positive effects of the hole-transport layer components with dramatically reduced negative effects. It minimizes the hygroscopicity of LiTFSI, while lowering the evaporation speed and corrosive effect of tBP. As a result, the PSCs fabricated with this tBP:LiTFSI ratio have the highest average device efficiency and obviously decreased efficiency variation with enhanced device stability, which is proposed as the golden ratio in PSCs. Our understanding of interactions between hole-transport layer additives and perovskite on a molecular level shows the pathway to further improve the PSCs' stability and performance reproducibility to make them a step closer to large-scale manufacturing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.8b09809

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Huang, Z., Wang, X., Li, Y., Günther, M., Valenzuela, S., Parikh, P., Cabreros, A., Xiong, W., & Meng, Y. S.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2018-11-06
Volume
140
Issue
48
Pages
16720-16730
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2899999691
Cited by
292
References
40
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unveiling the Role of tBP–LiTFSI Complexes in Perovskite Solar Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.8b09809
The paper
Wang, S., Huang, Z., Wang, X., Li, Y., Günther, M., Valenzuela, S., Parikh, P., Cabreros, A., Xiong, W., & Meng, Y. S. (2018). Unveiling the Role of tBP–LiTFSI Complexes in Perovskite Solar Cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b09809

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.