Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrochemical Fragmentation of Cu2O Nanoparticles Enhancing Selective C–C Coupling from CO2 Reduction Reaction

Jung, Hyejin, Lee, Si Young, Lee, Chan Woo, Cho, Min Kyung, Won, Da Hye, Kim, Cheonghee, Oh, Hyung-Suk, Min, Byoung Koun, Hwang, Yun Jeong·2019·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

In this study, we demonstrate that the initial morphology of nanoparticles can be transformed into small fragmented nanoparticles, which were densely contacted to each other, during electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR). Cu-based nanoparticles were directly grown on a carbon support by using cysteamine immobilization agent, and the synthesized nanoparticle catalyst showed increasing activity during initial CO 2 RR, doubling Faradaic efficiency of C 2 H 4 production from 27% to 57.3%. The increased C 2 H 4 production activity was related to the morphological transformation over reaction time. Twenty nm cubic Cu 2 O crystalline particles gradually experienced in situ electrochemical fragmentation into 2–4 nm small particles under the negative potential, and the fragmentation was found to be initiated from the surface of the nanocrystal. Compared to Cu@CuO nanoparticle/C or bulk Cu foil, the fragmented Cu-based NP/C catalyst achieved enhanced C 2+ production selectivity, accounting 87% of the total CO 2 RR products, and suppressed H 2 production. In-situ X-ray absorption near edge structure studies showed metallic Cu 0 state was observed under CO 2 RR, but the fragmented nanoparticles were more readily reoxidized at open circuit potential inside of the electrolyte, allowing labile Cu states. The unique morphology, small nanoparticles stacked upon on another, is proposed to promote C–C coupling reaction selectivity from CO 2 RR by suppressing HER.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.8b11237

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
Jung, H., Lee, S. Y., Lee, C. W., Cho, M. K., Won, D. H., Kim, C., Oh, H.-S., Min, B. K., & Hwang, Y. J.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2019-01-31
Volume
141
Issue
11
Pages
4624-4633
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2912281710
Cited by
611
References
11
FWCI
14.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.