Cited by 546CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalysts for Methane ReformingCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Enhanced Electrochemical Methanation of Carbon Dioxide with a Dispersible Nanoscale Copper Catalyst

Manthiram, Karthish, Beberwyck, Brandon J., Alivisatos, A. Paul·2014·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Although the vast majority of hydrocarbon fuels and products are presently derived from petroleum, there is much interest in the development of routes for synthesizing these same products by hydrogenating CO2. The simplest hydrocarbon target is methane, which can utilize existing infrastructure for natural gas storage, distribution, and consumption. Electrochemical methods for methanizing CO2 currently suffer from a combination of low activities and poor selectivities. We demonstrate that copper nanoparticles supported on glassy carbon (n-Cu/C) achieve up to 4 times greater methanation current densities compared to high-purity copper foil electrodes. The n-Cu/C electrocatalyst also exhibits an average Faradaic efficiency for methanation of 80% during extended electrolysis, the highest Faradaic efficiency for room-temperature methanation reported to date. We find that the level of copper catalyst loading on the glassy carbon support has an enormous impact on the morphology of the copper under catalytic conditions and the resulting Faradaic efficiency for methane. The improved activity and Faradaic efficiency for methanation involves a mechanism that is distinct from what is generally thought to occur on copper foils. Electrochemical data indicate that the early steps of methanation on n-Cu/C involve a pre-equilibrium one-electron transfer to CO2 to form an adsorbed radical, followed by a rate-limiting non-electrochemical step in which the adsorbed CO2 radical reacts with a second CO2 molecule from solution. These nanoscale copper electrocatalysts represent a first step toward the preparation of practical methanation catalysts that can be incorporated into membrane-electrode assemblies in electrolyzers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja5065284

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The predicted theoretical limiting potential for CH3OH production using Pt@dv-Gr is significantly less negative than any catalysts that produce CH4 or CH3OH in the literature, whether synthesized (-0.5 to -1.0 V) or predicted (-0.3 to -1.0 V).

    “In particular, as in the free energy diagram shown in Fig. 4 in detail, the predicted theoretical limiting potential (U L) for CH3OH production using Pt@dv-Gr is significantly less negative than any catalysts that produce CH4 or CH3OH in the literature, synthesized (–0.5 to –1.0 V)35,37,38 or predicted (–0.3 V to –1.0 V).4,6,39,40”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manthiram, K., Beberwyck, B. J., & Alivisatos, A. P.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Alivisatos, A. Paul
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2014-09-10
Volume
136
Issue
38
Pages
13319-13325
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2333668949
Cited by
546
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • Dow Chemical Company (20120984)
  • Office of Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
copper nanoparticles, glassy carbon support, Faradaic efficiency, catalyst loading, single electron transfer, membrane electrode assembly, CO2 electrolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review