The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational Design of Near-Infrared Aggregation-Induced-Emission-Active Probes: In Situ Mapping of Amyloid-β Plaques with Ultrasensitivity and High-Fidelity
Abstract
High-fidelity mapping of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques is critical for the early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. However, in vivo probing of Aβ plaques by commercially available thioflavin derivatives (ThT or ThS) has proven to be extremely limited, as evident by the restriction of enrichment quenching effect, low signal-to-noise ( S / N ) ratio, and poor blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetrability. Herein, we demonstrate a rational design strategy of near-infrared (NIR) aggregation-induced emission (AIE)-active probes for Aβ plaques, through introducing a lipophilic π-conjugated thiophene-bridge for extension to NIR wavelength range with enhancement of BBB penetrability, and tuning the substituted position of the sulfonate group for guaranteeing specific hydrophilicity to maintain the fluorescence- off state before binding to Aβ deposition. Probe QM-FN-SO 3 has settled well the AIE dilemma between the lipophilic requirement for longer emission and aggregation behavior from water to protein fibrillogenesis, thus making a breakthrough in high-fidelity feedback on in vivo detection of Aβ plaques with remarkable binding affinity, and serving as an efficient alternative to the commercial probe ThT or ThS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Amyloid Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Progress and Problems on the Road to Therapeutics
Hardy, J., & Selkoe, D. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072994 · Cited by 13,864
Aggregation-Induced Emission: Together We Shine, United We Soar!
Mei, J., Leung, N. L. C., Kwok, R. T. K., Lam, J. W. Y., & Tang, B. Z. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00263 · Cited by 8,270
Alzheimer's Disease: From Pathology to Therapeutic Approaches
Jakob‐Roetne, R., & Jacobsen, H. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802808 · Cited by 626
Cited by
Aggregation‐Induced Emission: Recent Advances in Materials and Biomedical Applications
Cai, X., & Liu, B. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202000845 · Cited by 796
Aggregation‐enhanced theranostics: AIE sparkles in biomedical field
Kang, M., Zhang, Z., Song, N., Li, M., Sun, P., Chen, X., Wang, D., & Tang, B. Z. (2020) · Aggregate · doi:10.1002/agt2.7 · Cited by 485
Gathering brings strength: How organic aggregates boost disease phototheranostics
Qi, J., Ou, H., Liu, Q., & Ding, D. (2021) · Aggregate · doi:10.1002/agt2.25 · Cited by 284
Niu, G., Zheng, X., Zhao, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, J., He, X., Chen, Y., Shi, X., Ma, C., Kwok, R. T. K., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b06196 · Cited by 183
Self-citationWang, J., Liu, Y., Morsch, M., Lu, Y., Shangguan, P., Han, L., Wang, Z., Chen, X., Song, C., Liu, S., et al. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202106082 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, W., Yan, C., Guo, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Tian, H., & Zhu, W.-H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-01-11
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3171-3177
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2910873803
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 37.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rational Design of Near-Infrared Aggregation-Induced-Emission-Active Probes: In Situ Mapping of Amyloid-β Plaques with Ultrasensitivity and High-Fidelity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.8b12820
- The paper
- Fu, W., Yan, C., Guo, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Tian, H., & Zhu, W.-H. (2019). Rational Design of Near-Infrared Aggregation-Induced-Emission-Active Probes: In Situ Mapping of Amyloid-β Plaques with Ultrasensitivity and High-Fidelity. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b12820
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.