The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural Evolution and Dynamics of an In2O3Catalyst for CO2Hydrogenation to Methanol: An Operando XAS-XRD and In Situ TEM Study
Abstract
We report an operando examination of a model nanocrystalline In 2 O 3 catalyst for methanol synthesis via CO 2 hydrogenation (300 °C, 20 bar) by combining X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), and in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Three distinct catalytic regimes are identified during CO 2 hydrogenation: activation, stable performance, and deactivation. The structural evolution of In 2 O 3 nanoparticles (NPs) with time on stream (TOS) followed by XANES-EXAFS-XRD associates the activation stage with a minor decrease of the In–O coordination number and a partial reduction of In 2 O 3 due to the formation of oxygen vacancy sites (i.e., In 2 O 3– x ). As the reaction proceeds, a reductive amorphization of In 2 O 3 NPs takes place, characterized by decreasing In–O and In–In coordination numbers and intensities of the In 2 O 3 Bragg peaks. A multivariate analysis of the XANES data confirms the formation of In 2 O 3– x and, with TOS, metallic In. Notably, the appearance of molten In 0 coincides with the onset of catalyst deactivation. This phase transition is also visualized by in situ TEM, acquired under reactive conditions at 800 mbar pressure. In situ TEM revealed an electron beam assisted transformation of In 2 O 3 nanoparticles into a dynamic structure in which crystalline and amorphous phases coexist and continuously interconvert. The regeneration of the deactivated In 0 /In 2 O 3– x catalyst by reoxidation was critically assessed revealing that the spent catalyst can be reoxidized only partially in a CO 2 atmosphere or air yielding an average crystallite size of the resultant In 2 O 3 that is approximately an order of magnitude larger than the initial one.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Cited by
Gao, L., Cui, X., Sewell, C. D., Li, J., & Lin, Z. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00962h · Cited by 1,038
Zhao, Y., Adiyeri Saseendran, D. P., Huang, C., Triana, C. A., Marks, W. R., Chen, H., Zhao, H., & Patzke, G. R. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00515 · Cited by 802
Oxygen vacancies in metal oxides: recent progress towards advanced catalyst design
Zhuang, G., Chen, Y., Zhuang, Z., Yu, Y., & Yu, J. (2020) · Science China Materials · doi:10.1007/s40843-020-1305-6 · Cited by 499
Yang, C., Pei, C., Luo, R., Liu, S., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Zhao, Z.-J., & Gong, J. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c07195 · Cited by 389
Zhu, J., Wang, P., Zhang, X., Zhang, G., Li, R., Li, W., Senftle, T. P., Liu, W., Wang, J., Wang, Y., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm3629 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsoukalou, A., Abdala, P. M., Stoian, D., Huang, X., Willinger, M.-G., Fedorov, A., & Müller, C. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-07-19
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 13497-13505
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2963739785
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.