Cited by 7Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsRedox biology and oxidative stress

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Free Radical-Based Sequencing for Native Top-Down Mass Spectrometry

Open access
Rojas Ramírez, Carolina, Murtada, Rayan, Gao, Jinshan, Ruotolo, Brandon T.·2022·Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Native top-down proteomics allows for both proteoform identification and high-order structure characterization for cellular protein complexes. Unfortunately, tandem MS-based fragmentation efficiencies for such targets are low due to an increase in analyte ion mass and the low ion charge states that characterize native MS data. Multiple fragmentation methods can be integrated in order to increase protein complex sequence coverage, but this typically requires use of specialized hardware and software. Free-radical-initiated peptide sequencing (FRIPS) enables access to charge-remote and electron-based fragmentation channels within the context of conventional CID experiments. Here, we optimize FRIPS labeling for native top-down sequencing experiments. Our labeling approach is able to access intact complexes with TEMPO-based FRIPS reagents without significant protein denaturation or assembly disruption. By combining CID and FRIPS datasets, we observed sequence coverage improvements as large as 50% for protein complexes ranging from 36 to 106 kDa. Fragment ion production in these experiments was increased by as much as 102%. In general, our results indicate that TEMPO-based FRIPS reagents have the potential to dramatically increase sequence coverage obtained in native top-down experiments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jasms.2c00252

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1038/nature01511 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.05.014 · DOI
  3. 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041550 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1021/cr068289b · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.11.019 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.11.014 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.04.006 · DOI
  9. Pagel K., 2010, Anal. Chem., 82, 5363, 10.1021/ac101121r · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nprot.2008.78 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.11.013 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/ac300193s · DOI
  13. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04999 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.1128868 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/s13361-017-1635-x · DOI
  16. 10.1146/annurev.anchem.111808.073627 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/rcm.7068 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.ijms.2010.06.032 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04563 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.04.017 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/ac061670b · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04806 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/jacs.0c01076 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/ja052042z · DOI
  25. 10.1002/mas.21568 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/ja038615u · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s13361-016-1508-8 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02707 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s13361-018-2100-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/jms.1955 · DOI
  31. 10.1039/C5SC01305D · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41598-022-13624-0 · DOI
  33. 10.1039/b904115j · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s13361-018-2114-8 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/jasms.1c00313 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.ijms.2015.06.019 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/jp501367w · DOI
  38. 10.1021/jacs.7b02774 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Rojas Ramírez, C., Murtada, R., Gao, J., & Ruotolo, B. T.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Montclair State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Ruotolo, Brandon T.
Venue
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Published
2022-11-08
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
2283-2290
ISSN
  • 1044-0305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-1123
OpenAlex
W4308528220
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM095832, R15 GM121986)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
Keywords
native top-down mass spectrometry, tandem mass spectrometry fragmentation, charge-remote fragmentation, sequencing depth, proteoform identification, protein complex formation
MeSH terms
Free Radicals, Mass Spectrometry, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review