Cited by 576Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Progress in Top-Down Proteomics and the Analysis of Proteoforms

Open access
Toby, Timothy K., Fornelli, Luca, Kelleher, Neil L.·2016·Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

From a molecular perspective, enactors of function in biology are intact proteins that can be variably modified at the genetic, transcriptional, or post-translational level. Over the past 30 years, mass spectrometry (MS) has become a powerful method for the analysis of proteomes. Prevailing bottom-up proteomics operates at the level of the peptide, leading to issues with protein inference, connectivity, and incomplete sequence/modification information. Top-down proteomics (TDP), alternatively, applies MS at the proteoform level to analyze intact proteins with diverse sources of intramolecular complexity preserved during analysis. Fortunately, advances in prefractionation workflows, MS instrumentation, and dissociation methods for whole-protein ions have helped TDP emerge as an accessible and potentially disruptive modality with increasingly translational value. In this review, we discuss technical and conceptual advances in TDP, along with the growing power of proteoform-resolved measurements in clinical and translational research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041550

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Nesvizhskii A Aebersold R 2005 Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem Mol Cell Proteom 4 1419 40 16009968
  2. [4]Gross JH 2004 Mass Spectrometry: A Textbook New York Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toby, T. K., Fornelli, L., & Kelleher, N. L.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Kelleher, Neil L.
Venue
Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry
Published
2016-06-12
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
499-519
ISSN
  • 1936-1327 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-1335
OpenAlex
W2429591244
Cited by
576
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA060553)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM108569, R01GM067193, T32GM105538)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
top-down proteomics, proteoforms, protein modification, post-translational modification, prefractionation, protein dissociation, protein inference, clinical proteomics, translational research
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Proteins, Mass Spectrometry, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review