The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Tilia (Tilia Argentea Desf Ex DC), Sage (Salvia Triloba L.), and Black Tea (Camellia Sinensis) Extracts
Abstract
The antioxidant activity of the water extract of Tilia argentea Desf ex DC was determined by the thiocyanate method. The antioxidant activity of the water extract increased with the increasing amount of lyophilized extract (50-400 microg) added into the linoleic acid emulsion. Statistically significant effect was determined in 100 microg and higher amounts. Antioxidant activities of water extracts of tilia (Tilia argentea Desf ex DC), sage (Salvia triloba L.), and two Turkish black teas commercially called Rize tea and young shoot tea (Camellia sinensis) were compared. For comparison studies, 100 microg portions of extracts were added into test samples. All samples were able to show statistically significant antioxidant effect. Both of the tea extracts showed highest antioxidant activities, nevertheless, differences between tilia and sage and tilia and tea were not statistically significant (for both cases p > 0.05). Like antioxidant activity, the reducing power of water extract of Tilia argentea Desf ex DC was also concentration dependent. Even in the presence of 50 microg of extract, the reducing power was significantly higher than that of the control (p < 0.05) in which there was no extract. Unlike antioxidant activity, the highest reducing power activity was shown by sage extract. Among the tea extracts, young shoot extract was the most effective one, however, it had significantly lower activity than sage (p < 0.05). Although tea flower had the lowest reducing power activity, it was higher than that of tilia. But this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). From these results, we could suggest that although the reducing power of a substance may be an indicator of its potential antioxidant activity, there may not always be a linear correlation between these two activities. In addition, antimicrobial activities of each of the above extracts were studied by disk diffusion methods on different test microorganisms. None of the extracts showed antibacterial activity on the studied microorganisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oxidative Stress: An Essential Factor in the Pathogenesis of Gastrointestinal Mucosal Diseases
Bhattacharyya, A., Chattopadhyay, R., Mitra, S., & Crowe, S. E. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00040.2012 · Cited by 2,484
Alam, N., Hossain, M., Mottalib, M. A., Sulaiman, S. A., Gan, S. H., & Khalil, M. I. (2012) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-12-175 · Cited by 159
Jafri, L., Saleem, S., Ihsan-ul-Haq, Ullah, N., & Mirza, B. (2017) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.05.002 · Cited by 130
PRATHAPAN, A., & RAJAMOHAN, T. (2011) · Journal of Food Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1745-4514.2010.00471.x · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Yıldırım, A., Mavi, A., Oktay, M., Kara, A. A., Algur, Ö. F., & Bilaloǧlu, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-09-28
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5030-5034
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2025874056
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.