Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Rumex crispus L. Extracts

Yıldırım, Ali, Mavi, Ahmet, Kara, Ayşe Aydan·2001·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
DOI 10.1021/jf0103572
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The antioxidant activities, reducing powers, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activities, amount of total phenolic compounds, and antimicrobial activities of ether, ethanol, and hot water extracts of the leaves and seeds of Rumex crispus L. were studied. The antioxidant activities of extracts increase with increasing amount of extracts (50-150 microg). However, the water extracts of both the leaves and seeds have shown the highest antioxidant activities. Thus, addition of 75 microg of each of the above extracts to the linoleic acid emulsion caused the inhibition of peroxide formation by 96 and 94%, respectively. Although the antioxidant activity of the ethanol extract of seed was lower than the water extract, the difference between these was not statistically significant, P > 0.05. Unlike the other extracts, 75 microg of the ether extract of seeds was unable to show statistically significant antioxidant activity, P > 0.05 (between this extract and control in that there is no extract in the test sample). Among all of the extracts, the highest amount of total phenolic compound was found in the ethanol extract of seeds, whereas the lowest amount was found in the ether extract of seeds. Like phenolic compounds, the highest reducing power and the highest DPPH scavenging activity were found in the ethanol extract of seeds. However, the reducing activity of the ethanol extract of seeds was approximately 40% that of ascorbic acid, whereas in the presence of 400 microg of water and ethanol extracts of seeds scavenging activities were about 85 and 90%, respectively. There were statistically significant correlations between amount of phenolic compounds and reducing power and between amount of phenolic compounds and percent DPPH scavenging activities (r = 0.99, P < 0.01, and r = 0.864, P < 0.05, respectively) and also between reducing powers and percent DPPH scavenging activities (r = 0.892, P < 0.05). The ether extracts of both the leaves and seeds and ethanol extract of leaves had shown antimicrobial activities on Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. However, none of the water extracts showed antimicrobial activity on the studied microorganisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf0103572

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Halliwell B., 1995, Biochem. Soc. Symp.
  2. Halliwell B., 1997, Antioxidant Methodology in Vivo and in Vitro concepts, 22
  3. Squadriato G. L., 1998, Free Radical Biol. Med., 25, 403
  4. Fridovich I, 1986, Methods Enzymol., 58, 97
  5. Halliwell B, 1994, Lancet, 344, 724, 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92211-X · DOI · Paper page
  6. Alho H., 1999, Methods Enzymol., 299, 15, 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99005-5 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J. M. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine ; Clarendon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1989; pp 23−30.
  8. Davies K. J. A., 1994, Biochem. Symp.
  9. Papas A. M, 1996, Lipids, 31, 82, 10.1007/BF02637055 · DOI
  10. Robinson E. E., 1997, Free Radical Res., 26, 302, 10.3109/10715769709097807 · DOI
  11. Sasaki S., 1996, J. Agric. Food Chem., 44, 1686
  12. Miller N. J., 1995, J. Agric. Food Chem., 43, 1801, 10.1021/jf00055a009 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Aruoma O. I., 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 13028
  14. Sawa T., 1999, J. Agric. Food Chem., 47, 492, 10.1021/jf980765e · DOI · Paper page
  15. Tanizawa H., 1992, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 40, 1942, 10.1248/cpb.40.1940 · DOI
  16. Hertog M. G. L., 1993, Lancet, 342, 1014
  17. Duh P.-D, 1998, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 75, 463, 10.1007/s11746-998-0249-7 · doi:10.1007/s11746-998-0249-7
  18. Granelli K., 1995, J. Sci. Food Agric., 67, 91, 10.1002/jsfa.2740670114 · DOI
  19. Fridowich I, 1995, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 64, 112
  20. Sun J., 1998, Free Radical Biol. Med., 24, 593
  21. Terao J., 1994, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 308, 284, 10.1006/abbi.1994.1039 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Espin J. C., 2000, J. Agric. Food Chem., 48, 656
  23. Branien A. L, 1975, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 52, 63
  24. Ito N., 1983, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 70, 347
  25. Rice-Evans C. A., 1997, Free Radical Res., 26, 398
  26. Lu Y., 2000, Food Chem., 68, 85
  27. Davis, P. H. Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands ; Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, Scotland, 1967; Vol. 2, pp 280−289.
  28. Singleton V. L., 1999, Methods Enzymol., 299, 178, 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99018-3 · DOI
  29. Yıldırım A., 2001, Turk. J. Med. Sci., 31, 27
  30. Blois M. S, 1958, Nature, 26, 1200
  31. Yen G. H., 1995, J. Agric. Food Chem., 43, 32
  32. Ingolfsdottir K., 1997, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 41, 217, 10.1128/AAC.41.1.215 · doi:10.1128/aac.41.1.215
  33. Meir S., 1995, J. Agric. Food Chem., 43, 181, 10.1021/jf00055a012 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Yıldırım A., 2000, J. Agric. Food Chem., 48, 5034, 10.1021/jf000590k · DOI · Paper page
  35. Diplock A T, 1997, Free Radical Res., 27, 532, 10.3109/10715769709065791 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Heinoman M., 1998, J. Agric. Food Chem., 46, 922
  37. Cook N. C., 1996, Nutr. Biochem., 7, 76

Cited by

See all 1,165

Metadata

Authors
Yıldırım, A., Mavi, A., & Kara, A. A.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2001-08-01
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
4083-4089
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
DOI
10.1021/jf0103572
OpenAlex
W2003848126
Cited by
1,165
References
1
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.