Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel Fluorometric Assay for Hydroxyl Radical Prevention Capacity Using Fluorescein as the Probe

Ou, Boxin, Hampsch-Woodill, Maureen, Flanagan, Judith, Deemer, Elizabeth K., Prior, Ronald L., Huang, Dejian·2002·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

A novel fluorometric method has been developed to evaluate hydroxyl radical prevention capacity using fluorescein (FL) as the probe. The hydroxyl radical is generated by a Co(II)-mediated Fenton-like reaction, and the hydroxyl radical formation under the experimental condition is indirectly confirmed by the hydroxylation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid. The fluorescence decay curve of FL is monitored in the absence or presence of antioxidant, the area under the fluorescence decay curve (AUC) is integrated, and the net AUC, which is an index of the hydroxyl radical prevention capacity, is calculated by subtracting the AUC of the blank from that of the antioxidant. Gallic acid is chosen as a reference standard, and the activity of sample is expressed as gallic acid equivalents. The method is rigorously validated through linearity, precision, accuracy, and ruggedness. A wide range of phenolic antioxidants is analyzed, and the hydroxyl radical prevention capacity is mainly due to the metal-chelating capability of the compounds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf011480w

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Ou, B., Hampsch-Woodill, M., Flanagan, J., Deemer, E. K., Prior, R. L., & Huang, D.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2002-04-05
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
2772-2777
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W1985091566
Cited by
349
References
7
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.