The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution of Conjugated and Free Phenols in Fruits: Antioxidant Activity and Cultivar Variations
Abstract
Total and free phenolic contents of 16 commonly consumed fruits (comprising 9 apples, 4 pears, and one each of peach, plum, and kiwi fruit cultivars) were measured by Folin-Ciocalteu assay. Total phenol contents varied from 272 to 475 mg of CtE/100 g of fresh weight. Of the apple cultivars studied, Braeburn and Empire had the highest and lowest total phenol content, respectively. The apple cultivars ranked in the following decreasing order: Braeburn > Red Delicious > Crisp Pink > Granny Smith > Royal Gala > Bramley > Golden Delicious > Fuji > Empire. Among pear cultivars, the order was Forelle > Taylor's > Peckham's > Conference. Peach and plum equally had high contents. The percentage of conjugated phenolics ranged between 3 (Red Delicious) and 77% (Empire) of the total phenols. Comparison of different cultivars of the same fruit and between different fruits showed broad variations in both phenolic content and in vitro antioxidant activity; a weak correlation (R(2) = 0.58) was observed between the phenolic content of the fruits and the total antioxidant activity, as estimated by the FRAP assay. The calculated dietary intake of total, free, and conjugated phenols from average per capita consumption of apples and pears in different regions of the U.K. varied between 104-126, 53-64, and 51-62 mg of CtE/day, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds
Kähkönen, M. P., Hopia, A. I., Vuorela, H. J., Rauha, J.-P., Pihlaja, K., Kujala, T. S., & Heinonen, M. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf990146l · Cited by 3,854
Hertog, M. G. L. (1995) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1995.00430040053006 · Cited by 1,853
Cited by
Carlsen, M. H., Halvorsen, B. L., Holte, K., Bøhn, S. K., Dragland, S., Sampson, L., Willey, C., Senoo, H., Umezono, Y., Sanada, C., et al. (2010) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-3 · Cited by 1,118
Quantification of Polyphenolics and Their Antioxidant Capacity in Fresh Plums
Kim, D.-O., Chun, O. K., Kim, Y. J., Moon, H.-Y., & Lee, C. Y. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0343074 · Cited by 913
Al-Farsi, M., Alasalvar, C., Morris, A., Baron, M., & Shahidi, F. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf050579q · Cited by 579
Atividade antioxidante de frutas do cerrado
Roesler, R., Malta, L. G., Carrasco, L. C., Holanda, R. B., Sousa, C. A. S., & Pastore, G. M. (2007) · Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos · doi:10.1590/s0101-20612007000100010 · Cited by 438
Maqsood, S., Adiamo, O., Ahmad, M., & Mudgil, P. (2020) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125522 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Imeh, U., & Khokhar, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-09-28
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6301-6306
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2005268873
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
