The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Health-Promoting Compounds in Broccoli as Influenced by Refrigerated Transport and Retail Sale Period
Abstract
Total aliphatic and indole glucosinolates, phenolic compounds (flavonoids and hydroxycinnamoyl derivatives), and vitamin C contents were evaluated in freshly harvested broccoli (Brassica oleracea L., var. italica, cv. Marathon) inflorescences. These were film-wrapped and stored for 7 days at 1 degrees C to simulate a maximum period of commercial transport and distribution. After cold storage, inflorescences were kept for 3 days at 15 degrees C to simulate a retail sale period. For wrapping, low-density polyethylene (LDPE) of 11 microm thickness was used. Gas composition was about 17% O(2) and 2% CO(2) during cold storage and about 16% O(2) and 3-4% CO(2) during shelf life within packages. The predominant glucosinolates were 4-methylsulfinylbutyl-glucosinolate (glucoraphanin), 3-indolylmethyl-glucosinolate (glucobrassicin), and 1-methoxy-3-indolylmethyl-glucosinolate (neoglucobrassicin). The predominant hydroxycinnamoyl derivatives were identified as 1,2,2'-trisinapoylgentiobiose, 1,2-diferuloylgentiobiose, 1,2'-disinapoyl-2-feruloylgentiobiose, and 3-O-caffeoyl-quinic (neochlorogenic acid). Results showed major losses at the end of both periods, in comparison with broccoli at harvest. Thus, the respective losses, at the end of cold storage and retail periods, were 71-80% of total glucosinolates, 62-59% of total flavonoids, 51-44% of sinapic acid derivatives, and 73-74% caffeoyl-quinic acid derivatives. Slight differences in all compound concentrations between storage and retail sale periods were detected. Distribution and retail periods had minimal effects on vitamin C. Weight loss was monitored at the end of both periods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Bioavailability of the polyphenols: Status and controversies
D’Archivio, M., Filesi, C., Varì, R., Scazzocchio, B., & Masella, R. (2010) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms11041321 · Cited by 950
Bioavailability of Glucosinolates and Their Breakdown Products: Impact of Processing
Barba, F. J., Nikmaram, N., Roohinejad, S., Khelfa, A., Zhu, Z., & Koubaa, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2016.00024 · Cited by 336
Extraction and Isolation of Phenolic Compounds
Santos-Buelga, C., Gonzalez-Manzano, S., Dueñas, M., & Gonzalez-Paramas, A. M. (2012) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-624-1_17 · Cited by 117
Ellong, E. N., Billard, C., Adenet, S., & Rochefort, K. (2015) · Food and Nutrition Sciences · doi:10.4236/fns.2015.63030 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Vallejo, F., Tomás-Barberán, F., & García-Viguera, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-04-10
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3029-3034
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1995084389
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health-Promoting Compounds in Broccoli as Influenced by Refrigerated Transport and Retail Sale Period. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf021065j
- The paper
- Vallejo, F., Tomás-Barberán, F., & García-Viguera, C. (2003). Health-Promoting Compounds in Broccoli as Influenced by Refrigerated Transport and Retail Sale Period. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf021065j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.