Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of the Chemical Composition and Physicochemical Properties of Different Fibers Prepared from the Peel of Citrus sinensis L. Cv. Liucheng

Chau, Chi-Fai, Huang, Ya-Ling·2003·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Fiber-rich fractions (FRFs) including soluble and insoluble dietary fibers (SDF and IDF), alcohol-insoluble solid (AIS), and water-insoluble solid (WIS) were isolated from the peel of Citrus sinensis L. cv. Liucheng for analysis and tests. The peel was rich in insoluble FRFs (IDF, AIS, and WIS; 476-515 g kg(-1) of peel), which were mainly composed of pectic substances and cellulose, and also contained pectic polysaccharide-rich SDF (94.1 g kg(-1) of peel). These insoluble FRFs had water-holding capacities (15.5-16.7 mL g(-1)), oil-holding capacities (2.35-5.09 g g(-1)), cation-exchange capacities (454-997 mequiv kg(-1)), and swelling properties (14.6-21.1 mL g(-1)) much higher than those of cellulose. These results recommended the consumption of these peel insoluble FRFs of desired physicochemical properties as sources of food fibers or low-calorie bulk ingredients in food applications requiring oil and moisture retention. Further investigations on the physiological functions of these peel FRFs using animal-feeding experiments are underway.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf025919b

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chau, C.-F., & Huang, Y.-L.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2003-03-27
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
2615-2618
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W1995789105
Cited by
425
References
0
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.