Cited by 201Food composition and propertiesProteins in Food SystemsFood and Agricultural Sciences

Starch, Functional Properties, and Microstructural Characteristics in Chickpea and Lentil As Affected by Thermal Processing

Aguilera, Yolanda, Esteban, Rosa M., Benítez, Vanesa, Mollá, Esperanza, Martín-Cabrejas, María A.·2009·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Changes in starch, functional, and microstructural characteristics that occurred in chickpea and lentil under soaking, cooking, and industrial dehydration processing were evaluated. Available starch in raw legumes represented 57-64%, and resistant starch (RS) is a significant component. As a result of cooking, available starch contents of soaked chickpea and lentil were significantly increased (21 and 12%, respectively) and RS decreased (65 and 49%, respectively) compared to raw flours. A similar trend was exhibited by dehydration, being more relevant in lentil (73% of RS decrease). The minimum nitrogen solubility of raw flours was at pH 3, and a high degree of protein insolubilization (80%) was observed in dehydrated flours. The raw legume flours exhibited low oil-holding capacities, 0.95-1.10 mL/g, and did not show any change by thermal processing, whereas water-holding capacities rose to 4.80-4.90 mL/g of sample. Emulsifying activity and foam capacity exhibited reductions as a result of cooking and industrial dehydration processing. The microstructural observations were consistent with the chemical results. Thus, the obtained cooked and dehydrated legume flours could be considered as functional ingredients for food formulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf902042r

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aguilera, Y., Esteban, R. M., Benítez, V., Mollá, E., & Martín-Cabrejas, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
  • Departamento de Química Agrícola, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28049 Madrid, Spain
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2009-10-30
Volume
57
Issue
22
Pages
10682-10688
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2080545716
Cited by
201
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
chickpea flour, lentil flour, legume starch, resistant starch, thermal processing, cooking, dehydration (food drying and plant water stress), starch availability, protein insolubilization, nitrogen solubility, water holding capacity, oil absorption capacity, emulsifying activity, foam capacity, starch microstructure
MeSH terms
Desiccation, Food Handling, Hot Temperature, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Seeds, Starch, Lens Plant, Cicer, Chemical Phenomena, Functional Food

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review