The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Green Tea Supplementation on Insulin Sensitivity in Sprague−Dawley Rats
Abstract
Epidemiological observations and laboratory studies have shown that green tea has a variety of health effects, including antitumor, antioxidative, and hypolipidemic activities. The aim of this study was to examine whether it had an effect on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in Sprague-Dawley rats. In experiment 1 (in vivo study), rats were divided into two groups: a control group fed standard chow and deionized distilled water and a "green tea" group fed the same chow diet but with green tea instead of water (0.5 g of lyophilized green tea powder dissolved in 100 mL of deionized distilled water). After 12 weeks of green tea supplementation, the green tea group had lower fasting plasma levels of glucose, insulin, triglyceride, and free fatty acid than the control rats. Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake of, and insulin binding to, adipocytes were significantly increased in the green tea group. In experiment 2 (in vitro study), a tea polyphenol extract was used to determine its effect on insulin activity in vitro. Green tea polyphenols (0.075%) significantly increased basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake of adipocytes. Results demonstrated that green tea increases insulin sensitivity in Sprague-Dawley rats and that green tea polyphenol is one of the active components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insulin-like Biological Activity of Culinary and Medicinal Plant Aqueous Extracts in Vitro
Broadhurst, C. L., Polansky, M. M., & Anderson, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf9904517 · Cited by 429
Cited by
Beneficial Effects of Green Tea—A Review
Cabrera, C., Artacho, R., & Giménez, R. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2006.10719518 · Cited by 1,904
Impact of Dietary Polyphenols on Carbohydrate Metabolism
Hanhineva, K., Törrönen, R., Bondia-Pons, I., Pekkinen, J., Kolehmainen, M., Mykkänen, H., & Poutanen, K. (2010) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms11041365 · Cited by 1,157
Beneficial effects of green tea: A literature review
Chacko, S. M., Thambi, P. T., Kuttan, R., & Nishigaki, I. (2010) · Chinese Medicine · doi:10.1186/1749-8546-5-13 · Cited by 987
Liu, K., Zhou, R., Wang, B., & Mi, M.-T. (2014) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.082024 · Cited by 323
Tsuneki, H., Ishizuka, M., Terasawa, M., Wu, J.-B., Sasaoka, T., & Kimura, I. (2004) · BMC Pharmacology · doi:10.1186/1471-2210-4-18 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, L.-Y., Juan, C.-C., Ho, L.-T., Hsu, Y.-P., & Hwang, L. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-01-15
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 643-648
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2042788012
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.