Cited by 429Natural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesMedicinal Plant ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

Insulin-like Biological Activity of Culinary and Medicinal Plant Aqueous Extracts in Vitro

Broadhurst, C. Leigh, Polansky, Marilyn M., Anderson, Richard A.·2000·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

To evaluate the possible effects on insulin function, 49 herb, spice, and medicinal plant extracts were tested in the insulin-dependent utilization of glucose using a rat epididymal adipocyte assay. Cinnamon was the most bioactive product followed by witch hazel, green and black teas, allspice, bay leaves, nutmeg, cloves, mushrooms, and brewer's yeast. The glucose oxidation enhancing bioactivity was lost from cinnamon, tea, witch hazel, cloves, bay leaf and allspice by poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) treatment, indicating that the active phytochemicals are likely to be phenolic in nature. The activity of sage, mushrooms, and brewers's yeast was not removed by PVP. Some products such as Korean ginseng, flaxseed meal, and basil have been reported to be effective antidiabetic agents; however, they were only marginally active in our assay. Our technique measures direct stimulation of cellular glucose metabolism, so it may be that the active phytochemicals in these plants improve glucose metabolism via other mechanisms or that this in vitro screening is not a reliable predictor of hypoglycemic effects in vivo for some products. In summary, the positive effects of specific plant extracts on insulin activity suggest a possible role of these plants in improving glucose and insulin metabolism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf9904517

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broadhurst, C. L., Polansky, M. M., & Anderson, R. A.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Richard A.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
849-852
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2054986712
Cited by
429
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
insulin-like activity, plant extracts, medicinal plants, spices, cinnamon, glucose uptake, adipocytes, polyvinylpyrrolidone, phenolic compounds, antidiabetic drugs, hypoglycemic effect, glucose metabolism, tea, witch hazel, mushrooms, brewing yeast
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glucose, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Phytotherapy, Plant Extracts, Plants, Medicinal, Spices, Adipocytes, Magnoliopsida, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review