The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Screening of Chemical Composition and Antifungal and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oils from Three Turkish Artemisia Species
Abstract
The compositions of essential oils isolated from the aerial parts of Artemisia absinthium, Artemisia santonicum, and Artemisia spicigera by hydrodistillation were analyzed by GC-MS, and a total of 204 components were identified. The major components of these essential oils were camphor (34.9-1.4%), 1,8-cineole (9.5-1.5%), chamazulene (17.8-nd%), nuciferol propionate (5.1-nd%), nuciferol butanoate (8.2-nd%), caryophyllene oxide (4.3-1.7%), borneol (5.1-0.6%), alpha-terpineol (4.1-1.6%), spathulenol (3.7-1.3%), cubenol (4.2-0.1%), beta-eudesmol (7.2-0.6%), and terpinen-4-ol (3.5-1.2%). The antifungal activities of these essential oils were tested against 11 plant fungi and were compared with that of a commercial antifungal reagent, benomyl. The results showed that all of the oils have potent inhibitory effects at very broad spectrum against all of the tested fungi. Pure camphor and 1,8-cineole, which are the major components of the oils, were also tested for antifungal activity against the same fungal species. Unlike essential oils, these pure compounds were able to show antifungal activity against only some of the fungal species. In addition, the antioxidant and DPPH radical scavenging activities of the essential oils, camphor, and 1,8-cineole were determined in vitro. All of the studied essential oils showed antioxidant activity, but camphor and 1,8-cineole did not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lopes-Lutz, D., Alviano, D. S., Alviano, C. S., & Kolodziejczyk, P. P. (2008) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.02.014 · Cited by 647
The Artemisia L. Genus: A Review of Bioactive Essential Oils
Abad, M. J., Bedoya, L. M., Apaza, L., & Bermejo, P. (2012) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules17032542 · Cited by 615
The Genus Artemisia: A Comprehensive Review
Bora, K. S., & Sharma, A. (2011) · Pharmaceutical Biology · doi:10.3109/13880209.2010.497815 · Cited by 548
Yang, S.-A., Jeon, S.-K., Lee, E.-J., Shim, C.-H., & Lee, I.-S. (2010) · Natural Product Research · doi:10.1080/14786410802496598 · Cited by 204
Mighri, H., Hajlaoui, H., Akrout, A., Najjaa, H., & Neffati, M. (2009) · Comptes Rendus Chimie · doi:10.1016/j.crci.2009.09.008 · Cited by 152
Comparing impacts of plant extracts and pure allelochemicals and implications for pest control.
Opender Koul, O. K., & Suresh Walia, S. W. (2009) · CABI Reviews · doi:10.1079/pavsnnr20094049 · Cited by 151
Ahmadi, F., Sadeghi, S., Modarresi, M., Abiri, R., & Mikaeli, A. (2010) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2010.01.028 · Cited by 118
Kim, J.-Y., Kim, S.-S., Oh, T.-H., Baik, J., Song, G., Lee, N., & Hyun, C.-G. (2009) · Acta Pharmaceutica · doi:10.2478/v10007-009-0022-y · Cited by 38
Tesser, R., Vitiello, R., Russo, V., Turco, R., Di Serio, M., Lin, L., & Li, C. (2020) · Industrial Oil Plant · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4920-5_8 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Kordali, S., Cakir, A., Mavi, A., Kilic, H., & Yildirim, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-02-10
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1408-1416
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2054760534
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
