The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Properties in Wheat Bran
Abstract
Bran samples of seven wheat varieties from four different countries were examined and compared for their phytochemical compositions and antioxidant activities. Phenolic acid composition, tocopherol content, carotenoid profile, and total phenolic content were examined for the phytochemical composition of wheat bran, whereas the measured antioxidant activities were free radical scavenging properties against 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical, radical cation 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt, peroxide radical anion O(2)(.-), and oxygen radical and chelating capacities. The results showed that the tested wheat bran samples differed in their phytochemical compositions and antioxidant properties. Ferulic acid, with a concentration range of 99-231 microg/g, was the predominant phenolic acid in all of the tested bran samples and accounted for about 46-67% of total phenolic acids on a weight basis. The concentrations for alpha-, delta-, and gamma- tocopherols were 1.28-21.29, 0.23-7.0, and 0.92-6.90 microg/g, respectively. In addition, lutein and cryptoxanthin were detected in all of the tested bran samples with levels of 0.50-1.80 and 0.18-0.64 microg/g, respectively. Zeaxanthin was detected in the six bran samples, and the greatest zeaxanthin concentration of 2.19 microg/g was observed in the Australian general purpose wheat bran. Beta-carotene was detected in four of the tested bran samples at a range of 0.09-0.40 microg/g. These data suggest that wheat and wheat bran from different countries may differ in their potentials for serving as dietary sources of natural antioxidants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antioxidant potential of ferulic acid
Graf, E. (1992) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(92)90184-i · Cited by 1,115
Cited by
The contribution of wheat to human diet and health
Shewry, P. R., & Hey, S. J. (2015) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.64 · Cited by 1,447
New hypotheses for the health-protective mechanisms of whole-grain cereals: what is beyond fibre?
Fardet, A. (2010) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422410000041 · Cited by 1,030
Wheat bran: Its composition and benefits to health, a European perspective
Stevenson, L., Phillips, F., O'sullivan, K., & Walton, J. (2012) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.3109/09637486.2012.687366 · Cited by 459
Shen, Y., Song, X., Li, L., Sun, J., Jaiswal, Y., Huang, J., Liu, C., Yang, W., Williams, L., Zhang, H., et al. (2019) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.074 · Cited by 206
Wu, H., Flint, A. J., Qi, Q., van Dam, R. M., Sampson, L. A., Rimm, E. B., Holmes, M. D., Willett, W. C., Hu, F. B., & Sun, Q. (2015) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6283 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, K., Su, L., & Yu, L. (.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-09-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 6108-6114
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2075542858
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.