The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Maize Primary Cell Wall Microfibril: A New Model Derived from Direct Visualization
Abstract
Understanding the molecular architecture of the plant cell wall is critical to reducing the biomass recalcitrance problem, which currently impedes economic bioconversion processing. The parenchyma cell walls from field senesced, maize stem pith have been directly visualized without extraction processes using high-resolution atomic force microscopy (AFM). By imaging the cell wall inner surfaces from different cells and different faces of the same cell, we were able to map the native primary cell wall ultrastructures. Depending on the thickness of non-cellulosic deposition, the parallel-microfibrils appear in various morphologies ranging from clearly defined to completely embedded in the wall matrixes forming cell wall lamella. Macrofibrils were found to exist only on the uppermost layer of the native primary cell wall and appeared to be bundles of elementary fibrils. This novel observation led us to a new hypothesis for the cell wall fibrillar network and biosynthesis processes. Put concisely, a number of elementary fibrils are synthesized at one locus, that of the cellulose synthase complex (CelS), and coalesce into much larger macrofibrils. These macrofibrils eventually split at the ends to form parallel microfibrils with deposition of other cell wall components (i.e. hemicelluloses, pectin, etc.) also evident. On the basis of these AFM surface measurements and current supportive evidence from cell wall biophysics, biosynthesis, and genomics, we propose a new molecular model consisting of a 36-glucan-chain elementary fibril, in which the 36-glucan chains form both crystalline and subcrystalline structures. We also propose a modified model of CelS based on recently reported experimental evidence from plant cell wall biosynthesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities
Jørgensen, H., Kristensen, J. B., & Felby, C. (2007) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.4 · Cited by 1,143
Deconstruction of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Fuels and Chemicals
Chundawat, S. P. S., Beckham, G. T., Himmel, M. E., & Dale, B. E. (2011) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114205 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citationPayne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Self-citationReviving the carbohydrate economy via multi-product lignocellulose biorefineries
Zhang, Y.-H. P. (2008) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10295-007-0293-6 · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, S.-Y., & Himmel, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-01-17
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 597-606
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1977561071
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Maize Primary Cell Wall Microfibril: A New Model Derived from Direct Visualization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf051851z
- The paper
- Ding, S.-Y., & Himmel, M. E. (2006). The Maize Primary Cell Wall Microfibril: A New Model Derived from Direct Visualization. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf051851z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.