The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antioxidant Activities and Anthocyanin Content of Fresh Fruits of Common Fig (Ficus carica L.)
Abstract
Fig fruit has been a typical component in the health-promoting Mediterranean diet for millennia. To study the potential health-promoting constituents of fig fruits, six commercial fig varieties differing in color (black, red, yellow, and green) were analyzed for total polyphenols, total flavonoids, antioxidant capacity, and amount and profile of anthocyanins. Using reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC), various concentrations of anthocyanins but a similar profile was found in all varieties studied. Hydrolysis revealed cyanidin as the major aglycon. Proton and carbon NMR confirmed cyanidin-3-O-rhamnoglucoside (cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside; C3R) as the main anthocyanin in all fruits. Color appearance of fig extract correlated well with total polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and antioxidant capacity. Extracts of darker varieties showed higher contents of phytochemicals compared to lighter colored varieties. Fruit skins contributed most of the above phytochemicals and antioxidant activity compared to the fruit pulp. Antioxidant capacity correlated well with the amounts of polyphenols and anthocyanins (R2 = 0.985 and 0.992, respectively). In the dark-colored Mission and the red Brown-Turkey varieties, the anthocyanin fraction contributed 36 and 28% of the total antioxidant capacity, respectively. C3R contributed 92% of the total antioxidant capacity of the anthocyanin fraction. Fruits of the Mission variety contained the highest levels of polyphenols, flavonoids, and anthocyanins and exhibited the highest antioxidant capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genkinger, J. M., Platz, E. A., Hoffman, S. C., Comstock, G. W., & Helzlsouer, K. J. (2004) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwh339 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Phenolic compounds in fruits – an overview
Haminiuk, C. W. I., Maciel, G. M., Plata‐Oviedo, M. S. V., & Peralta, R. M. (2012) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03067.x · Cited by 566
Ficus spp. (fig): Ethnobotany and potential as anticancer and anti-inflammatory agents
Lansky, E. P., Paavilainen, H. M., Pawlus, A. D., & Newman, R. A. (2008) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2008.06.025 · Cited by 347
Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Ficus carica: A review
Badgujar, S. B., Patel, V. V., Bandivdekar, A. H., & Mahajan, R. T. (2014) · Pharmaceutical Biology · doi:10.3109/13880209.2014.892515 · Cited by 295
Çalişkan, O., & Aytekin Polat, A. (2011) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2011.02.023 · Cited by 254
Hajam, T. A., & H, S. (2022) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110237 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Solomon, A., Golubowicz, S., Yablowicz, Z., Grossman, S., Bergman, M., Gottlieb, H. E., Altman, A., Kerem, Z., & Flaishman, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-09-07
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 7717-7723
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1970195467
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.