The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carryover of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) from Soil to Plant and Distribution to the Different Plant Compartments Studied in Cultures of Carrots (Daucus carota ssp. Sativus), Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum), and Cucumbers (Cucumis Sativus)
Abstract
A vegetation study was carried out to investigate the carryover of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) from soil mixed with contaminated sewage sludge to potato, carrot, and cucumber plants. Analysis was done by liquid-extraction using acetonitrile with dispersive SPE cleanup and subsequent HPLC-MS/MS. In order to assess the transfer potential from soil, transfer factors (TF) were calculated for the different plant compartments: TF = [PFC](plant (wet substance))/[PFC](soil (dry weight)). The highest TF were found for the vegetative plant compartments with average values for PFOS below those for PFOA: cucumber, 0.17 (PFOS), 0.88 (PFOA); potato, 0.36 (PFOS), 0.40 (PFOA); carrot, 0.38 (PFOS), 0.53 (PFOA). Transfer of PFOA and PFOS into potato peelings (average values of TF: PFOA 0.03, PFOS 0.04) exceeded the carryover to the peeled tubers (PFOA 0.01, PFOS < 0.01). In carrots, this difference did not occur (average values of TF: PFOA 0.04, PFOS 0.04). Transfer of PFOS into the unpeeled cucumbers was low and comparable to that of peeled potatoes (TF < 0.01). For PFOA, it was higher (TF: 0.03).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anastassiades, M., Lehotay, S. J., Štajnbaher, D., & Schenck, F. J. (2003) · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.1093/jaoac/86.2.412 · Cited by 5,670
Powley, C. R., George, S. W., Ryan, T. W., & Buck, R. C. (2005) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0508090 · Cited by 396
Lindstrom, A. B., Strynar, M. J., Delinsky, A. D., Nakayama, S. F., McMillan, L., Libelo, E. L., Neill, M., & Thomas, L. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es1039425 · Cited by 227
Yoo, H., Washington, J. W., Jenkins, T. M., & Ellington, J. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es102972m · Cited by 182
Long-Term Environmental Fate of Perfluorinated Compounds after Accidental Release at Toronto Airport
Awad, E., Zhang, X., Bhavsar, S. P., Petro, S., Crozier, P. W., Reiner, E. J., Fletcher, R., Tittlemier, S. A., & Braekevelt, E. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2001985 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Accumulation of perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in agricultural plants: A review
Ghisi, R., Vamerali, T., & Manzetti, S. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.023 · Cited by 705
Post, G. B., Cohn, P. D., & Cooper, K. R. (2012) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.007 · Cited by 639
Abunada, Z., Alazaiza, M. Y. D., & Bashir, M. J. K. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12123590 · Cited by 397
Bolan, N., Sarkar, B., Yan, Y., Li, Q., Wijesekara, H., Kannan, K., Tsang, D. C. W., Schauerte, M., Bosch, J., Noll, H., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123892 · Cited by 375
Uptake of Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids by Hydroponically Grown Lettuce (Lactuca sativa)
Felizeter, S., McLachlan, M. S., & de Voogt, P. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302398u · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Lechner, M., & Knapp, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-09-26
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11011-11018
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2318901351
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
