Cited by 163Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Long-Term Environmental Fate of Perfluorinated Compounds after Accidental Release at Toronto Airport

Awad, Emily, Zhang, Xianming, Bhavsar, Satyendra P., Petro, Steve, Crozier, Patrick W., Reiner, Eric J., Fletcher, Rachael, Tittlemier, Sheryl A. +1 more·2011·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS; a perfluorinated compound or PFC), its salts, and perfluorooctane sulfonyl fluoride have recently been listed in Annex B of the Stockholm Convention due to their widespread presence, persistence, and toxicity. Because of the persistent nature of PFCs, it is generally presumed that the impact of direct discharges of these chemicals on a receiving environment would be long-lasting. However, long-term environmental fate studies based on field measurements are rare. We examined spatial and long-term (9 year) temporal trends of PFCs in water, sediment, fish, and fish liver collected in 2003, 2006, and 2009 from 10 locations spanning ∼20 km in Etobicoke and Spring Creeks, where an accidental release of fire fighting foam containing PFOS from nearby Toronto International Airport occurred in 2000. Even a decade after the spill, sediment PFOS concentrations are still elevated in Spring Creek Pond which received the foam discharge; however, the major impact is relatively localized likely due to the stormwater management nature of the pond and the diluting effect of Etobicoke Creek. Fish and fish liver PFOS concentrations at a Spring Creek location downstream of Spring Creek Pond declined by about 70 and 85%, respectively, between 2003 and 2009. PFOS in water at locations further downstream in Etobicoke Creek have declined by >99.99% since the spill; however, the 2009 water and fish levels were ∼2-10 times higher than upstream locations likely due to the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es2001985

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The average PFOS concentration (0.98 ± 1.38 ng/mL and 1.73 ± 1.77 ng/mL) detected in surface water samples at BAFB were similar to the PFOS concentration (0.69 ng/mL) detected in a water sample 3 years after an accidental spill in Toronto.

    “The average PFOS concentration (0.98 ± 1.38 ng/mL and 1.73 ± 1.77 ng/mL) detected in surface water samples at BAFB were similar to the PFOS concentration (0.69 ng/mL) detected in a water sample 3 years after an accidental spill in Toronto (Awad et al., 2011).”
  • The average PFOS concentration at BAFB was at least 3 times greater than the PFOS concentration (0.29 ng/mL) in a water sample collected 9 years after the accidental AFFF spill in Toronto.

    “However, the average PFOS concentration at BAFB was at least 3 times greater than the PFOS concentration (0.29 ng/mL) in a water sample collected 9 years after the accidental AFFF spill in Toronto (Awad et al., 2011).”
  • Many replacement PFAS degrade in the environment to legacy per- and polyfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs), so PFCAs are still found in AFFF-impacted sites.

    “Many replacement PFAS degrade in the environment to the legacy per-and polyfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs), so although PFCAs had been phased out from AFFF formulations, they are still found in AFFF-impacted sites”
  • Prior work indicates that AFFF use at modern airports releases diverse PFASs to downstream aquatic environments, including compounds in the first PCA/cluster.

    “Prior work indicates uses of AFFF in modern airports release diverse PFASs to downstream aquatic environments, including the compounds identified as part of the first PCA/cluster.4,29-31”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Awad, E., Zhang, X., Bhavsar, S. P., Petro, S., Crozier, P. W., Reiner, E. J., Fletcher, R., Tittlemier, S. A., & Braekevelt, E.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Health Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Bhavsar, Satyendra P.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2011-07-20
Volume
45
Issue
19
Pages
8081-8089
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2319146648
Cited by
163
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFOS, firefighting foam, accidental release, sediment contamination, fish bioaccumulation, fish liver, bioaccumulation factor, perfluorocarboxylates, perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, Stockholm Convention, long-term trends, urbanization, persistent organic pollutants, environmental fate
MeSH terms
Animals, Canada, Environmental Monitoring, Fishes, Fluorocarbons, Geography, Liver, Time Factors, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Geologic Sediments, Biohazard Release, Airports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review