The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Reconstruction of the Nonvolatile Sensometabolome of a Red Wine
Abstract
The first comprehensive quantitative determination of 82 putative taste-active metabolites and mineral salts, the ranking of these compounds in their sensory impact based on dose-over-threshold (DoT) factors, followed by the confirmation of their sensory relevance by taste reconstruction and omission experiments enabled the decoding of the nonvolatile sensometabolome of a red wine. For the first time, the bitterness of the red wine could be demonstrated to be induced by subthreshold concentrations of phenolic acid ethyl esters and flavan-3-ols. Whereas the velvety astringent onset was imparted by three flavon-3-ol glucosides and dihydroflavon-3-ol rhamnosides, the puckering astringent offset was caused by a polymeric fraction exhibiting molecular masses above >5 kDa and was found to be amplified by the organic acids. The perceived sourness was imparted by l-tartaric acid, d-galacturonic acid, acetic acid, succinic acid, l-malic acid, and l-lactic acid and was slightly suppressed by the chlorides of potassium, magnesium, and ammonium, respectively. In addition, d-fructose and glycerol as well as subthreshold concentrations of glucose, 1,2-propandiol, and myo-inositol were found to be responsible for the sweetness, whereas the mouthfulness and body of the red wine were induced only by glycerol, 1,2-propandiol, and myo-inositol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scharbert, S., & Hofmann, T. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf050294d · Cited by 600
Self-citation
Cited by
Nature’s Chemical Signatures in Human Olfaction: A Foodborne Perspective for Future Biotechnology
Dunkel, A., Steinhaus, M., Kotthoff, M., Nowak, B., Krautwurst, D., Schieberle, P., & Hofmann, T. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201309508 · Cited by 549
Self-citationDifferent Phenolic Compounds Activate Distinct Human Bitter Taste Receptors
Soares, S., Kohl, S., Thalmann, S., Mateus, N., Meyerhof, W., & De Freitas, V. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf304198k · Cited by 299
Singh, N. (2017) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-017-2537-4 · Cited by 290
Xiang, Q., Xia, Y., Song, J., Nazmus Saqib, M., & Zhong, F. (2023) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134034 · Cited by 48
Insights on the chemical basis of the astringency of Spanish red wines
Sáenz-Navajas, M.-P., Avizcuri, J.-M., Ferreira, V., & Fernández-Zurbano, P. (2012) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.060 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Hufnagel, J. C., & Hofmann, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-08-19
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 9190-9199
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1998214063
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Reconstruction of the Nonvolatile Sensometabolome of a Red Wine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf801742w
- The paper
- Hufnagel, J. C., & Hofmann, T. (2008). Quantitative Reconstruction of the Nonvolatile Sensometabolome of a Red Wine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801742w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.