The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Varietal Differences in the Phenolic Content and Superoxide Radical Scavenging Potential of Wines from Different Sources
Abstract
Thirty-one wine samples differing in their origin of production and vintages were analyzed for total phenolic content, total and free sulfur dioxide contents, and superoxide radical scavenging potentials. The polyphenol content of red wine ranged from 735.9 to 2858 ppm, and that of white wine was in the range 259.4−720.5 ppm. Total sufur dioxide content ranged from 21.9 to 270.7 ppm, and had no correlation to the color of the wine. Superoxide radical scavenging activity values ranged from 39.3 to 215.9 units/mL for the white wine, and those of red varieties were ∼5−10 times higher. No correlation was observed between the free and total sulfur dioxide contents in the different wine samples tested and their superoxide radical scavenging activity values. A direct correlation between the color of the wine ( r = 0.7517), its phenolic content ( r = 0.9908), and the ability of the wine constituents to scavenge superoxide radical was, however, established by a simple regression analysis. Keywords: Wine; phenolics; radical scavenger; varietal difference
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents
Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965) · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture · doi:10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144 · Cited by 24,852
The Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of Avoidable Risks of Cancer in the United States Today
Doll, R., & Peto, R. (1981) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/66.6.1192 · Cited by 3,927
Cited by
Biological Activities of Polyphenols from Grapes
Xia, E.-Q., Deng, G.-F., Guo, Y.-J., & Li, H.-B. (2010) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms11020622 · Cited by 1,063
Fogliano, V., Verde, V., Randazzo, G., & Ritieni, A. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf980496s · Cited by 640
Antioxidant Activity of Extracts from Acacia confusa Bark and Heartwood
Chang, S.-T., Wu, J.-H., Wang, S.-Y., Kang, P.-L., Yang, N.-S., & Shyur, L.-F. (2001) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0100907 · Cited by 489
Green tea and grape seed extracts—Potential applications in food safety and quality
Perumalla, A. V. S., & Hettiarachchy, N. S. (2011) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.022 · Cited by 471
Relationship among Antioxidant Activity, Vasodilation Capacity, and Phenolic Content of Red Wines
Burns, J., Gardner, P. T., O'Neil, J., Crawford, S., Morecroft, I., McPhail, D. B., Lister, C., Matthews, D., MacLean, M. R., Lean, M. E. J., et al. (2000) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf9909757 · Cited by 447
Phenolic compounds and total antioxidant potential of commercial wines
Minussi, R. C., Rossi, M., Bologna, L., Cordi, L., Rotilio, D., Pastore, G. M., & Durán, N. (2003) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00590-3 · Cited by 377
Gülçin, İ., Büyükokuroǧlu, M. E., Oktay, M., & Küfrevioǧlu, Ö. İ. (2003) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00036-9 · Cited by 255
Kondo, Y., Ohnishi, M., & Kawaguchi, M. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf9811119 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Sato, M., Ramarathnam, N., Suzuki, Y., Ohkubo, T., Takeuchi, M., & Ochi, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-41
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2088829738
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.