The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phenolic Compounds in Virgin Olive Oil. 2. Reappraisal of the Extraction, HPLC Separation, and Quantification Procedures
Abstract
The extraction procedures (solid/liquid SPE and liquid/liquid LLE) and HPLC separation and quantification methods of polyphenolic compounds have been checked in virgin olive oils in order to explain the differences in content reported in the literature. The work has been carried out on oils prepared from one cultivar and produced under the same protocol. The extraction methods are practically equivalent, but the SPE technique is more favorable because it is faster and simpler. It has been proved that the chromatographic features and the method of chemical expression of the concentrations may greatly affect the final values. Thus, under the same analytical method, the total concentration values of polyphenols of the same oil show variations from 18% to 80%, according to the formality of expression as gallic acid, caffeic acid, or tyrosol equivalents. The role of the nature and spectrophotometric features of the phenols and of the internal standard is also discussed, and it was found to be an important source of reported variation. A gradient separation with an eluent mixture acetonitrile-sulfuric acid (0.1 mol/L), detection at 225 nm, and quantitative calculation of polyphenolic compounds in oils (expressed as tyrosol equivalents, THY(eq)) is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bendini, A., Cerretani, L., Carrasco-Pancorbo, A., Gómez-Caravaca, A. M., Segura-Carretero, A., Fernández-Gutiérrez, A., & Lercker, G. (2007) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/12081679 · Cited by 784
Mateos, R., Espartero, J. L., Trujillo, M., Ríos, J. J., León-Camacho, M., Alcudia, F., & Cert, A. (2001) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0013205 · Cited by 472
Servili, M., Esposto, S., Fabiani, R., Urbani, S., Taticchi, A., Mariucci, F., Selvaggini, R., & Montedoro, G. F. (2009) · Inflammopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s10787-008-8014-y · Cited by 414
Vinha, A. F., Ferreres, F., Silva, B. M., Valentão, P., Gonçalves, A., Pereira, J. A., Oliveira, M. B., Seabra, R. M., & Andrade, P. B. (2005) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.03.012 · Cited by 340
Andrewes, P., Busch, J. L. H. C., de Joode, T., Groenewegen, A., & Alexandre, H. (2003) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf026042j · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Pirisi, F. M., Cabras, P., Cao, C. F., Migliorini, M., & Muggelli, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-03-30
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1191-1196
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2022397774
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phenolic Compounds in Virgin Olive Oil. 2. Reappraisal of the Extraction, HPLC Separation, and Quantification Procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf991137f
- The paper
- Pirisi, F. M., Cabras, P., Cao, C. F., Migliorini, M., & Muggelli, M. (2000). Phenolic Compounds in Virgin Olive Oil. 2. Reappraisal of the Extraction, HPLC Separation, and Quantification Procedures. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf991137f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.