The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of a Diverse Set of Compounds Using Quantitative Structure−Property Relationships
Abstract
"Fail early and fail fast" is the current paradigm that the pharmaceutical industry has adopted widely. Removing non-drug-like compounds from the drug discovery lifecycle in the early stages can lead to tremendous savings of resources. Thus, fast screening methods are needed to profile the large collection of synthesized and virtual libraries involved in the early stage. Solubility is one of the filters that are applied extensively to ensure that the compounds are reasonably soluble so that synthesis of the compounds and assay studies of pharmacokinetics and toxicity are feasible. To address this need, we have developed a fast quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) model for the prediction of aqueous solubility (at 298 K, unbuffered solution) from the molecular structures. Multiple linear regressions and genetic algorithms were used to develop the models. The model was based on a set of diverse compounds including small organic molecules and drug and drug-like species. The predicted solubility for the training and test sets agrees well with the experimental values. The coefficient of determination is R(2) = 0.84 for the training set of 775 compounds and the RMS error = 0.87. This model was validated on four sets of compounds. The RMS error for the 1665 compounds from the four validation data sets (including compounds from the Physician's Desk References and Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry databases) is 1 log unit and the unsigned error is 0.77. This model does not require 3-D structure generation which is rather time-consuming. Using 2-D structure as input, this model is able to compute solubility for 90 000-700 000 compounds/h on a SGI Origin 2000 workstation. This kind of fast calculation allows the model to be used in data mining and screening of large synthesized or virtual libraries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Pharmaceutical innovation by the seven UK‐owned pharmaceutical companies (1964‐1985).
Prentis, R., Lis, Y., & Walker, Sr. (1988) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb03318.x · Cited by 471
Cited by
Random Forest Models To Predict Aqueous Solubility
Palmer, D. S., O'Boyle, N. M., Glen, R. C., & Mitchell, J. B. O. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci060164k · Cited by 364
Varnek, A., Fourches, D., Hoonakker, F., & Solov’ev, V. P. (2005) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-005-9008-0 · Cited by 208
AI-guided pipeline for protein–protein interaction drug discovery identifies a SARS-CoV-2 inhibitor
Trepte, P., Secker, C., Olivet, J., Blavier, J., Kostova, S., Maseko, S. B., Minia, I., Silva Ramos, E., Cassonnet, P., Golusik, S., et al. (2024) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/s44320-024-00019-8 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, A., & Merz, K. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-07-23
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3572-3580
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2063346968
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of a Diverse Set of Compounds Using Quantitative Structure−Property Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm020266b
- The paper
- Cheng, A., & Merz, K. M. (2003). Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of a Diverse Set of Compounds Using Quantitative Structure−Property Relationships. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm020266b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.