Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lessons Learned from Marketed and Investigational Prodrugs

Ettmayer, Peter, Amidon, Gordon L., Clement, Bernd, Testa, Bernard·2004·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
DOI 10.1021/jm0303812
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPerspectiveNEXTLessons Learned from Marketed and Investigational ProdrugsPeter Ettmayer, Gordon L. Amidon, Bernd Clement, and Bernard TestaView Author Information Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Brunnerstrasse 59, A-1235 Vienna, Austria, College of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1065, Pharmaceutical Institute, University of Kiel, D-24118 Kiel, Germany, and Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital Centre (CHUV), CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 10, 2393–2404Publication Date (Web):April 13, 2004Publication History Received7 August 2003Published online13 April 2004Published inissue 1 May 2004https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0303812Copyright © 2004 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSArticle Views6980Altmetric-Citations282LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit Read OnlinePDF (231 KB) Get e-AlertsSUBJECTS:Cells,Metabolism,Peptides and proteins,Pharmaceuticals,Targeting Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jm0303812

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Ettmayer, P., Amidon, G. L., Clement, B., & Testa, B.
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2004-04-13
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
2393-2404
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
DOI
10.1021/jm0303812
OpenAlex
W2951106423
Cited by
384
References
40
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.